TABLE 1: Differences between low and high-risk clusters for congenital syphilis and syphilis in pregnant women according to sociodemographic data and health indicators. Mato Grosso, 2008 to 2016.
Indicators | Municipalities belonging to clusters | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Syphilis in Pregnant Woman | Congenital Syphilis | |||||||
Total | low risk | high risk | p-value* | Total | low risk | high risk | p-value* | |
58 | 24 (%) | 34 (%) | 82 | 48 (%) | 34 (%) | |||
PHISF | 0.563 | 0.001* | ||||||
< median | 24 | 11 (45.8) | 13 (38.2) | 49 | 36 (75.0) | 13 (38.2) | ||
≥ median | 34 | 13 (54.2) | 21 (61.8) | 33 | 12 (25.0) | 21 (61.8) | ||
VP | 0.825 | 0.146 | ||||||
< median | 28 | 12 (50.0) | 16 (47.1) | 31 | 15 (31.3) | 16 (47.1) | ||
≥ median | 30 | 12 (50.0) | 18 (52.9) | 51 | 33 (68.7) | 18 (52.9) | ||
PWS (< 8 years) | 0.032* | <0.001* | ||||||
< median | 36 | 11 (45.8) | 25 (73.5) | 39 | 14 (29.2) | 25 (73.5) | ||
≥ median | 22 | 13 (54.2) | 9 (26.5) | 43 | 34 (70.8) | 9 (26.5) | ||
PWT (≤ 19 years) | 0.231$ | <0.001* | ||||||
< median | 43 | 20 (83.3) | 23 (67.6) | 36 | 13 (27.1) | 23 (67.7) | ||
≥ median | 15 | 4 (16.7) | 11 (32.4) | 46 | 35 (72.9) | 11 (32.3) | ||
LBPC (≥ 7) | 0.397 | 0.628 | ||||||
< median | 30 | 14 (58.3) | 16 (47.1) | 36 | 20 (41.7) | 16 (47.1) | ||
≥ median | 28 | 10 (41.7) | 18 (52.9) | 46 | 28 (58.3) | 18 (52.9) | ||
LBRC non-white | 0.263 | 0.040* | ||||||
< median | 24 | 12 (50.0) | 12 (35.3) | 40 | 28 (58.3) | 12 (35.3) | ||
≥ median | 34 | 12 (50.0) | 22 (64.7) | 42 | 20 (41.7) | 22 (64.7) |
Pearson's ᵡ2 test; $Fisher’s exact test. *p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. PHISF: % people in homes with inadequate sanitation facilities; VP: % vulnerable to poverty; PWS (< 8 years): % pregnant woman < 8 years of schooling; PWT (≤ 19 years): % pregnant woman teenager (≤ 19 years); LBPC (≥ 7): % LB with ≥ 7 prenatal care; LBR non-white: % LB race/non-white color. Median: PHIBW = 62.88%; VP = 33.87%; PWS (< 8 years) = 29.84%; PWT (≤ 19 years) = 23.96%; LBPC (≥ 7) = 68.39%; LBRC non-white = 69.75%. Note: The high-risk cluster for PS in Nova Bandeirantes was excluded from this analysis because it was a single-year event (2011).