Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep 1;73:152–162. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.013

Table 3:

ROI mean and standard deviation of parameter values of NLR3D and MS-ResNet methods for three parameter mapping applications are compared.

Data ROI NLR3D (ms) MS-ResNet (ms) Parameter Map
T2 brain 1 74.1 ±1.6 74.5 ±1.0
2 71.1 ±1.3 70.5 ±1.3
3 66.9 ±1.3 65.4 ± 0.9
4 158.7 ± 29.4 154.9 ± 27.6
5 117.6 ± 34.4 116.1 ± 32.4
6 98.5 ± 29.3 93.3 ± 26.7
T1 brain 1 889 ± 44 877 ± 33
2 852 ± 53 856 ± 37
3 869 ± 52 850 ± 35
4 1575±306 1550±293
5 2168 ± 571 2282 ± 563
6 2072 ± 480 2053±464
T1 abdomen 1 692 ± 58 690 ± 50
2 741± 76 738 ± 54
3 1470±243 1467±255
4 1261 ±197 1286±200
5 1236±76 1240 ±89
6 1201±110 1239 ±104