Table 2.
Genetic model | NAFLD | NASH | |
---|---|---|---|
G vs. T | OR (95% CI) | 1.08 (0.681.70) | 1.88 (0.774.55) |
P | 0.76 | 0.164 | |
I-squared (%) | 87.7 | 81.4 | |
PH | 0.000 | 0.005 | |
GT vs. TT | OR (95% CI) | 1.38 (0.583.26) | 3.16 (1.13-8.83) |
P | 0.46 | 0.028 | |
I-squared (%) | 74.8 | 0 | |
PH | 0.001 | 0.892 | |
GG vs. TT | OR (95% CI) | 1.34 (0.453.95) | 3.24 (0.9810.68) |
P | 0.60 | 0.053 | |
I-squared (%) | 84.5 | 17.2 | |
PH | 0.000 | 0.299 | |
GT+GG vs. TT | OR (95% CI) | 1.37 (0.533.55) | 3.03 (1.138.09) |
P | 0.51 | 0.027 | |
I-squared (%) | 81.5 | 0 | |
PH | 0.000 | 0.499 | |
GG vs. GT+TT | OR (95% CI) | 0.98 (0.641.49) | 1.48 (0.69 3.18) |
P | 0.91 | 0.319 | |
I-squared (%) | 76.8 | 73.3 | |
PH | 0.000 | 0.010 |
P: P-value of Z-test for statistical significance, PH: P-value of Q-test for heterogeneity test