Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;26(4):171–178. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_201_20

Table 2.

The correlation between MTTP rs1800591 polymorphism with NAFLD and NASH under five genetic models

Genetic model NAFLD NASH
G vs. T OR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.681.70) 1.88 (0.774.55)
P 0.76 0.164
I-squared (%) 87.7 81.4
PH 0.000 0.005
GT vs. TT OR (95% CI) 1.38 (0.583.26) 3.16 (1.13-8.83)
P 0.46 0.028
I-squared (%) 74.8 0
PH 0.001 0.892
GG vs. TT OR (95% CI) 1.34 (0.453.95) 3.24 (0.9810.68)
P 0.60 0.053
I-squared (%) 84.5 17.2
PH 0.000 0.299
GT+GG vs. TT OR (95% CI) 1.37 (0.533.55) 3.03 (1.138.09)
P 0.51 0.027
I-squared (%) 81.5 0
PH 0.000 0.499
GG vs. GT+TT OR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.641.49) 1.48 (0.69 3.18)
P 0.91 0.319
I-squared (%) 76.8 73.3
PH 0.000 0.010

P: P-value of Z-test for statistical significance, PH: P-value of Q-test for heterogeneity test