Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J. 2019 Oct 14;884(1):75. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3be8

Table 7.

Comparison of Models Predicting ACE Transform of Bond Albedo, Back-transformed Prediction, R2, and Adjusted R2, for Prediction of the ACE Transform of A, for Prediction of the Back-transform to A, AIC Score, and Log-likelihood That the Model Minimizes the Information Loss over the Model with the Lowest AIC Score

Model Description R2 for Prediction of acet(A) Adjusted R2 Prediction of acet(A) R2 after Back-transform to A Units AIC Log-likelihood
tAp.all GAM of all ACE transforms 0.935 0.919 0.834 27  1.0
tAp.no-x.all GAM without ACE transforms of explanatory variables in tAp.all 0.640 0.555 −0.211 109  1.6e−18
tAp.tS0X.tTstar. K.all GAM with only two variables, transforms of S0X and Tstar.K 0.727 0.715 0.352 82  1.1e−12