Table 1. Summary of pooled rates.
Outcome | Pooled rate (95 % confidence interval) | I2; 95 % prediction interval |
Technical success | 84.8 % (79.1–89.2); 22 studies | 61 %; 56 to 96 |
|
77.5 % (61.2–88.3); 4 studies | 0 %; 38 to 95 |
|
85.3 % (72–92.9); 5 studies | 79 %; 11 to 99 |
|
91.2 % (83–95.6); 9 studies | 0 %; 81 to 96 |
|
82 % (67.1–91.1); 4 studies | 84 %; 4 to 99 |
|
87.5 % (77.7–93.4); 6 studies | 66 %; 41 to 98 |
|
83.5 % (76.1–88.9); 16 studies | 58 %; 54 to 95 |
|
84.4 % (77.4–89.5); 17 studies | 68 %; 48 to 97 |
|
86.5 % (74.3–93.5); 5 studies | 0 %; 63 to 96 |
|
84.1 % (71.8–91.6); 5 studies | 64 %; 41 to 94 |
|
92.6 % (84.4–96.6); 6 studies | 30 %; 52 to 94 |
Successful PD drained | 77.5 % (63.1–87.4); 11 studies | 88 %; 21 to 98 |
|
69.2 % (47–85); 4 studies | 85 %; 2 to 99 |
|
89.4 % (75.7–95.8); 4 studies | 9 %; 46 to 99 |
|
Insufficient data | -NA- |
|
87.2 % (69.5–95.3); 4 studies | 80 %; 4 to 95 |
|
70.2 % (52.1–83.5); 7 studies | 87 %; 43 to 93 |
|
79.5 % (47.7–94.3); 3 studies | 68 %; 3 to 98 |
|
84.2 % (53–96.2); 3 studies | 93 %; 2 to 98 |
Clinical success | 89.2 % (82.1–93.7); 18 studies | 73 %; 50 to 98 |
|
92.5 % (83.9–96.7); 9 studies | 50 %; 44 to 99 |
|
76.2 % (58.9–87.7); 4 studies | 76 %; 9 to 99 |
|
Insufficient data | -NA- |
|
91 % (80.2–96.2); 4 studies | 0 %; 65 to 98 |
|
90.2 % (77.9–96); 5 studies | 49 %; 47 to 99 |
|
88.3 % (79–93.8); 13 studies | 71 %; 41 to 98 |
|
89.6 % (81.2–94.5); 14 studies | 75 %; 45 to 99 |
|
88.8 % (67.7–96.8); 4 studies | 64 %; 7 to 99 |
|
86.4 % (71.9–94.1); 5 studies | 71 %; 43 to 98 |
|
85.3 % (70.3–93.5); 6 studies | 77 %; 42 to 99 |
Adverse events (all) | 18.1 % (14.2–22.9); 22 studies | 45 %; 8 to 36 |
|
18.7 % (12.4–27.2); 5 studies | 32 %; 6 to 44 |
|
15.8 % (10.3–23.6); 9 studies | 31 %; 5 to 39 |
|
12.8 % (7.4–21.3); 4 studies | 0 %; 4 to 40 |
|
27.9 % (19.4–38.2); 4 studies | 48 %; 6 to 70 |
|
24.3 % (16.8–33.7), 6 studies | 51 %; 8 to 55 |
|
15.9 % (11.8–21); 16 studies | 30 %; 7 to 31 |
|
17.9 % (13.4–23.5); 17 studies | 50 %; 7 to 39 |
|
18.2 % (10.8–29); 5 studies | 32 %; 5 to 49 |
Adverse events by ASGE Lexicon | ||
|
13 % (8.3–19.9); 19 studies | 69 %; 2 to 49 |
|
9.9 % (6.5–14.8); 19 studies | 48 %; 3 to 30 |
|
3.9 % (2.5–5.9); 19 studies | 0 %; 2 to 6 |
Post EUS-PDD individual adverse events | ||
|
6.6 % (4.5–9.4); 21 studies | 5 %; 4 to 11 |
|
4.1 % (2.7–6.2); 21 studies | 0 %; 3 to 6 |
|
3.1 % (1.9–5); 21 studies | 0 %; 2 to 5 |
|
2.3 % (1.4–4); 21 studies | 0 %; 1 to 4 |
|
2.8 % (1.7–4.6); 21 studies | 0 %; 2 to 5 |
|
13.9 % (8.2–22.6); 10 studies | 65 %; 3 to 49 |
|
21.3 % (11.5–36.2); 12 studies | 85 %; 2 to 80 |
|
15.2 % (9.1–24.1); 6 studies | 44 %; 4 to 45 |
Publication bias | Eggers P = 0.01 |
PD, pancreatic duct; ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; EUS-PDD, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage.