Table 4.

Comparison of hybrid methods used in state-of-the-art

Authors	Classification method	Accuracy (%)
Patil et al. [53]	LR, DT, RF	96.58
Niranjan et al. [48]	RC, KNN, IBK, LR, PART	97.3
Chiew et al. [19]	RF, C4.5, Part, SVM, NB	96.17
Pandey et al. [50]	RF, SVM	94