Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;11:568385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568385

TABLE 4.

Descriptive statistical analysis.

Dim M SD Discriminate Validity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
TRGB 4.052 0.794 0.811
EIB 3.971 0.853 0.739** 0.802
ECB 3.866 0.894 0.682** 0.774** 0.840
EHB 3.621 0.986 0.610** 0.688** 0.754** 0.837
VF 3.972 0.749 0.648** 0.615** 0.650** 0.682** 0.785
NSF 3.846 0.844 0.603** 0.587** 0.624** 0.694** 0.778** 0.820
DAF 4.006 0.781 0.660** 0.643** 0.612** 0.618** 0.747** 0.754** 0.812
EMD 3.604 1.048 0.269** 0.248** 0.284** 0.331** 0.296** 0.336** 0.327** 0.863
EXD 3.678 0.938 0.320** 0.372** 0.392** 0.421** 0.429** 0.463** 0.443** 0.160** 0.744

N = 412. **p < 0.01. The numbers in the cells of the diagonal line are the square root of AVE. TRGB, Task-related green behavior; EIB, Eco-initiatives behavior; ECB, Eco-civic engagement behavior; EHB, Eco-helping behavior; VF, Values fit; NSF, Needs-supplies fit; DAF, Demands-abilities fit; EMD, Emotional distance; EXD, Expectation distance.