Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;11:568385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568385

TABLE 5.

Analysis results of the direct effects.

Path relationship Estimate S.E. Est./S.E. P-Value Supported
(1)VF →TRGB 0.544 0.224 2.427  0.015* YES
(2)VF→EIB 0.390 0.226 1.728 0.084 NO
(3)VF→ECB 0.605 0.226 2.681 0.007** YES
(4)VF→EHB 0.506 0.206 2.463  0.014* YES
(5)NSF→TRGB −0.213 0.212 −1.006 0.314 NO
(6)NSF→EIB −0.105 0.212 −0.496 0.620 NO
(7)NSF→ECB 0.045 0.208 0.216 0.829 NO
(8)NSF →EHB 0.375 0.19 1.973  0.049* YES
(9)DAF→TRGB 0.467 0.139 3.354 0.001** YES
(10)DAF→EIB 0.505 0.143 3.526 *** YES
(11)DAF→ECB 0.129 0.142 0.911 0.362 NO
(12)DAF→EHB −0.082 0.132 −0.625 0.532 NO

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. TRGB, Task-related green behavior; EIB, Eco-initiatives behavior; ECB, Eco-civic engagement behavior; EHB, Eco-helping behavior; VF, Values fit; NSF, Needs-supplies fit; DAF, Demands-abilities fit.