Table 2.
Construct | Indicator | Factor loading | Variance | Error | SCR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS | IS1 Compatible information systems | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.86 | 0.67 |
IS2 Information sharing | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.29 | |||
IS3 Joint information center | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.28 | |||
SCV | SCV1 Product related information | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.63 |
SCV2 information related to demand and supply | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.28 | |||
SCV3 Information related inventory | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.28 | |||
ST | ST2 dispositional trust | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.90 | 0.70 |
ST3 Clear rule for classification of process and procedures | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.17 | |||
ST4 role clarity | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.29 | |||
ST5 category | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.37 | |||
C | C1 Impact of relationship termination | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.64 |
C2 Improvement in coordination | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.14 | |||
C3 Shared values | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.56 | |||
CO | CO1 The objectives for which collaboration was established are being met | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.65 |
CO2 the engaged humanitarian actors seems to be happy with the overall efforts of the actors towards disaster relief efforts | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.44 | |||
CO3 our humanitarian organization seems to be satisfied with the overall outcome of our collaborative efforts | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.28 | |||
AG | AG1 Dynamic sensing | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.87 | 0.71 |
AG2 Dynamic speed | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.14 | |||
AG3 Dynamic flexibility | 0.61 | 0.37 | 0.63 |
IS information sharing, SCV supply chain visibility, ST swift-trust, C commitment, CO collaboration, AG agility