Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;66(6):1085–1104. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01375-5

Table 5.

Linguistic variables for (a) criterion importance used for IVF-AHP comparison, and (b) performance of alternatives used for IVF-VIKOR comparison

(a)
Level of importance Triangular IVF number
Equal importance (1,1); 1; (1,1)
Moderate importance (1,2); 3; (4,5)
Strong importance (3,4); 5; (6,7)
Very strong importance (5,6); 7; (8,9)
Extreme importance (7,8); 9; (9,9)
(b)
Level of performance Triangular IVF number
Very poor (0.0); 0; (1,1.5)
Poor (0.0.5); 1; (2.5,3.5)
Moderately poor (0.1.5); 3; (4.5,5.5)
Fair (2.5,3.5); 5; (6.5,7.5)
Moderately good (4.5,5.5); 7; (8,9.5)
Good (5.5,7.5); 9; (9.5,10)
Very good (8.5,9.5); 10; (10.10)