Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;41(12):3475–3483. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04824-5

Table 4.

Results of the questionnaire in all contacted patients (45), in patients with new-onset seizures, in patient with known epilepsy or not new-onset seizures.

Daily screen time (DST) and p value
total sleep time (TST)
All population
Daily screen time (hours)
  Pre-lockdown 2.5 (0.15–9.0) [IQR 1.5–3.0] p 0.0001
  During lockdown 5.8 (2.15–12) [IQR 3.5–8.5]
Total sleep time (hours)
  Pre-lockdown 9 (7.0–13.5) [IQR 8.0–10.0] p 0.117
  During lockdown 8 (6.5–12.0) [IQR 7–10.12]
Seizure latency 2.75 (0–24) [IQR 0–9.0]
Patients with new-onset seizure
Daily screen time (hours)
Pre-lockdown 2.5 (1.0–5.0) [IQR 1.5–3.0] p 0.0001
During lockdown 7.5 (2.5–12.5) [IQR 6.0–10.0]
Total sleep time (hours)
  Pre-lockdown 9.0 (7.0–11.0) [IQR 8.0–9.5] p 0.140
  During lockdown 8.5 (6.5–9.0) [IQR 7.5–9.0]
Seizure latency 5 (0–10.0) [IQR 2.0–8.0]
Patients with known epilepsy or not new-onset seizure
Daily screen time (hours)
  Pre-lockdown 2.5 (1.0–5.0) [IQR 1.5–3.0] p 0.0001
  During lockdown 7.5 (2.5–12.5) [IQR 6.0–10.0]
Total sleep time (hours)
  Pre-lockdown 9.0 (7.0–11.0) [IQR 8.0–9.5] p 0.140
  During lockdown 8.5 (6.5–9.0) [IQR 7.5–9.0]
Seizure latency 5 (0–10.0) [IQR 2.0–8.0]

Categorical variables are expressed as a number and percentage. Continuous non-parametric variables are reported as the median, range and interquartile [IQR]. Wilcoxon test was used to compare the hours of DST and TST pre and during lockdown period.