Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 18;11(10):431–441. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.431

Table 2.

Alignment of the total joint arthroplasty including the tibial and femoral components

Control group Introduction group P value (Control vs Introduction) Follow-up group P value (Control vs Follow-up) Test
Tibial AP-alignment, mean (95%CI) 88.5 (88.1-88.9) 88.5 (88.1-88.9) 0.68 88.5 (88.1-88.8) 1.0 Mann-Whitney U test
Outliers, n (%) 11 (14.7) 10 (13.3) 0.81 10 (16.1) 0.81 χ2
Femoral AP-alignment, mean (95%CI) 96.0 (95.5-96.5) 95.4 (95.0-95.8) 0.06 95.6 (95.2-96.0) 0.22 Unpaired T-test
Outliers, n (%) 21 (28) 14 (18.7) 0.18 11 (17.7) 0.16 χ2
Post-operative TFA, mean (95%CI) 4.4 valgus (3.8-5.0) 3.8 valgus (3.3-4.4) 0.16 4.2 valgus (3.6-4.8) 0.62 Unpaired T-test
Outliers, n (%) 25 (33.3) 26 (34.7) 0.86 23 (37.1) 0.65 χ2
Medial Tibial Overhang, n (%) 5 (6.7) 8 (10.7) 0.38 6 (9.7) 0.52 χ2
Lateral Tibial Overhang, n (%) 6 (8.0) 7 (9.3) 0.77 4 (6.5) 0.73 χ2
Tibial Slope, mean (95%CI) 88.8 (88.2-89.4) 85.1 (84.4-85.8) < 0.0001 84.9 (84.2-85.5) < 0.0001 Unpaired T-test
Outliers, n (%) 21 (28.0) 13 (17.3) 0.12 12 (19.4) 0.24 χ2
Femoral Flexion (FF), mean (95%CI) 86.2 (85.3-87.0) 88.2 (87.8-88.7) < 0.0001 88.2 (87.8-88.6) < 0.0001 Unpaired T-test
Outliers, n (%) 44 (58.7) 28 (37.3) 0.009 16 (25.8) < 0.0001 χ2

For AP alignment femoral and tibial components, < 90 degrees correspond to varus placement and > 90 degrees correspond to valgus placement. Outliers were found based on intervals for optimal alignment of the components[13]. For normally distributed data, in accordance with Shapiro Wilk-test, kurtosis, skewness and histogram inspection mean values are presented and p-value calculated using the unpaired T-test. Otherwise Mann-Whitney U test was applied. P values for categorical data is calculated using Pearsons Chi-squared (χ2) test. 95%CI: 95 % Confidence interval; TFA: Tibio-femoral angle.