Table 2.
Effect of oleogel and composite gel on the percentage (%) of wound healing in experimental rats.
| Group | Percentage of wound healing (mean + SEM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 | Day 9 | Day 15 | Day 21 | |
| Control | 5.62 ± 1.27 | 39.402 ± 0.772 | 68.208 ± 0.544 | 85.97 ± 0.46 |
| Paraffin oil | 6.34 ± 1.55 | 54.56 ± 0.62** | 76.89 ± 0.625* | 90.91 ± 0.135* |
| Oleogel 1 | 10.04 ± 1.30 | 64.26 ± 0.62*** | 86.60 ± 0.44** | 96.05 ± 0.19** |
| Oleogel 2 | 12.94 ± 0.88* | 72.91 ± 0.33*** | 90.60 ± 0.32*** | 98.92 ± 0.14** |
| Composite gel | 12.83 ± 0.50* | 68.21 ± 1.07*** | 87.39 ± 0.35** | 97.06 ± 0.069** |
aPercentage value of mean ± SEM of each group. Significance was P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***). Comparison of treated groups with the control group. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons.