CNNs [43] |
CCNs are used for feature extraction from acceleration time series. |
91% |
91.16% |
LSTMs [43] |
The performance of LSTMs for real-time HAR is analyzed and compared with some other DL/ML models. |
85.86% |
85.34% |
LSTMs [44] |
Temporal and sensor attentions are added to LSTMs to improve their performance for HAR. |
- |
89.96% |
BiLSTMs [43] |
BiLSTMs are applied to the real-time HAR domain. |
89.52% |
89.4% |
CNN-LSTMs [45] |
The HAR performance of CNNs and that of CNN-LSTMs are compared. |
88.68% |
88.98% |
SVMs [43] |
The application of SVMs to real-time HAR is investigated and their performance is compared to some other ML/DL models. |
84.07% |
83.76% |
SVMs [46] |
class-based decision fusion is used for effective combination of sensor data. |
- |
82.32% |
KNNs [47] |
A feature extraction technique is proposed for accelerometer data recorded by sensors in smart devices. |
- |
91.1% |