Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2019 Dec 10;111:104063. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Interference effects in grammatical (a) and ungrammatical conditions (b). The figure shows the posterior means together with 95% credible intervals of the interference effects in total fixation times. These estimates were obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the original data of Dillon et al. (2013), and from our replication data. Separate effect estimates for each dependency type as well as the overall effect obtained when collapsing over dependencies are presented. The left-most line of each plot shows the range of predictions of the Lewis and Vasishth (2005) ACT-R cue-based retrieval model (see Section Deriving quantitative predictions from the Lewis and Vasishth (2005) model for details).