Table 2.

Bayesian analysis of Dillon et al. (2013)’s Experiment 1. The table shows the mean of all fixed effects’ posterior distributions together with 95% Bayesian credible intervals of total fixation times at the critical region. Both models were fit on the log-scale; all numbers in this table are back-transformed to ms for easier interpretability. For more details about the model specification and the contrast coding of the fixed effects, see Section Bayesian re-analysis of the Dillon et al. data.

	Effect	Posterior mean and 95% Credible Interval (ms)
Models 1, 2	Dependency	119 [71, 169]
	Grammaticality	100 [69, 134]
	Dependency×Grammaticality	9 [−18, 36]
Model 1	Interference [grammatical]	−16 [−52, 20]
	Interference [ungrammatical]	−38 [−79, 1]
	Dependency×Interference [grammatical]	−17 [−56, 19]
	Dependency×Interference [ungrammatical]	−21 [−56, 12]
Model 2	Interference [grammatical] [reflexives]	2 [−57, 60]
	Interference [grammatical] [agreement]	−34 [−85, 15]
	Interference [ungrammatical] [reflexives]	−18 [−72, 36]
	Interference [ungrammatical] [agreement]	−60 [−112, −5]