Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;20(4):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5467

Table 5.

Explanations for changes in the Vision sub-scale.

Where Vision score increased (7 sites) Where Vision score decreased (6 sites)

Thematic statements
  • Competent management/leadership, and key people with clear roles helped to push the initiative forward

  • Strong collaboration to co-design the initiative and good continuity of team members over time

  • Feedback to reinforce a shared vision and build confidence in the achievability of outcomes

  • Careful planning to ensure feasibility, regular meetings, and additional measures to ensure good information sharing

  • Maintenance of focus by declining participation in other projects

  • Sense of urgency, political support, and support of management that enhanced motivation/enthusiasm

  • Weak or unstable leadership

  • External constraints affecting the initiative

  • Absence of clearly delineated roles and responsibilities for team members

  • Lack of a strong communication plan, and failure to develop a common understanding of the initiative

  • Focus of the initiative lost over time, or had to change to fit external constraints (leading to frustration).