Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2020 Sep 18;116:104174. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104174

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in the eye-tracking meta-analysis

#Subs #Items HC MC MC* LC Experiment Details
Rayner & Well, 1996 18 36 86% 41% 4%
Rayner, et al., 2005 16 36 85% 36% 4% Native Mandarin readers
Rayner, et al., 2006 (younger) 16 36 86% 41% 4% 3x2: Pred. x Font difficulty
Rayner, et al., 2006 (older) 16 36 86% 41% 4% 3x2: Pred. x Font difficulty
Sereno, et al., 2018 - Exp. 1 40 150 97% 54% 1% 3x2: Pred. x Frequency
Sereno, et al., 2018 - Exp. 2 40 150 97% 54% 1% Pred. x Freq.; invalid previews
Paul - Exp. 3 (unpublished) 32 32 91% 67% 37% 6% *Two “med. cloze” conditions
Paul - Exp. 4 (unpublished) 40 48 90% 65% 35% 5% 50% invalid previews