Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0241302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241302

Table 2. Comparison of quality of life dimensions scores (mean ± standard deviation) with Short Form-8 (SF-8) scores between University of California (UCD) and University of Pretoria (UP) veterinary medical students.

UCD (N = 102) UP (N = 74) P-value
Role emotional (RE) 38.7 ± 10.0 35.6 ± 10.6 0.114
Mental health (MH) 40.0 ± 7.7 42.0 ± 8.2 0.09
Social functioning (SF) 42.6 ± 9.4 39.6 ± 9.2 0.179
Vitality (VT) 45.0 ± 8.3 45.6 ± 7.6 0.795
General health perception (GH) 43.2 ± 9.9 44.4 ± 8.5 0.554
Role physical (RP) 47.8 ± 7.0 48.8 ± 7.3 0.443
Physical functioning (PF) 47.7 ± 7.1 50.2 ± 7.5 0.039
Bodily pain (BP) 50.3 ± 7.3 48.5 ± 8.3 0.020
Mental component summary (MCS) 36.5 ± 11.5 34.5 ± 12.3 0.418
Physical component summary (PCS) 49.8 ± 7.6 50.8 ± 8.4 0.727

Scores below 50 points (mean score = 50, standard deviation = 10) corresponded to deviations from normality and indicate a poorer quality of life, whereas scores above 50 points represented a better quality of life than that of the average adult American population [22]. Row score comparisons between the 2 schools with P <0.05 are different.