Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;35(3):212–218. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.48265

Table 1.

A comparison of RRMS patients and healthy individuals by demographics.

RRMS patients n=58 (P-value)
Demographics Active n=22 Inactive n=36 Healthy subjects n=50 ANOVA test LSD test
Age/Year (39.82±10.78) (34.22±8.98) (33.96±7.31) P=0.154 P1=0.097 NS
(Mean±SD) 3.25 2.12 1.46 Non-significant P2=0.067 NS
SEM P3=0.922 NS
x2 test
Age groups/Year 20-40 (10) 45.5% (28) 77.8% (32) 64% P1=0.012 S
(n) % 41-60 (12) 54.5% (8) 22.2% (18) 36% P=0.043 P2=0.141 NS
Significant P3=0.171 NS
x2 test
Gender Male (M) (6) 27.3% (14) 38.9% (18) 36% P=0.659 P1=0.366 NS
Female (F) (16) 72.7% (22) 66.1% (32) 64% Non-significant P2=0.469 NS
(n) % M/F ratio 0.375 0.636 0.5625 P3=0.785 NS

Note: p1=Active vs. inactive, p2=Active vs. healthy donors, p3=Inactive vs. healthy donors, NS =Non-significant difference at p values above 0.05, S=Significant difference at p values below 0.05, HS=Highly significant difference at P values below 0.01.