Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):193–200. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.200032

Table 3.

Comparison of the adolescents’ attitudes toward suicide among three parenting styles after adjusting confounders*

Factor Pro-democracy (mean±SD) Authoritarian (mean±SD) Permissive (mean±SD) p-value Post-hoc
Suicide as a right 2.99±0.02 3.18±0.05 3.10±0.06 <0.001
Incomprehensibility 3.29±0.03 3.08±0.06 3.09±0.08 0.003 †‡
Non-communication 3.23±0.02 3.38±0.04 3.28±0.05 0.002
Preventability 4.03±0.02 3.74±0.05 3.91±0.06 <0.001 †§
Tabooing 2.57±0.02 2.78±0.05 2.71±0.06 0.002
Normal-common 3.03±0.03 3.31±0.06 3.15±0.07 <0.001
Suicidal process 3.07±0.03 3.15±0.06 3.15±0.07 0.360
Relation caused 2.59±0.03 2.87±0.06 2.64±0.07 <0.001
Preparedness to prevent 3.76±0.03 3.65±0.06 3.68±0.07 0.163
Resignation 1.88±0.04 2.13±0.08 2.08±0.09 0.004
*

confounders: CESD-R score, sex, religion, socio-economic status, family numbers, the mean difference between the pro-democracy and authoritarian groups is statistically significant (p<0.05), the mean difference between the pro-democracy and permissive groups is statistically significant (p<0.05), §the mean difference between the authoritarian and permissive groups is statistically significant (p<0.05)