Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;27(4):241–248. doi: 10.1007/s10804-020-09365-x

Table 2.

Latent growth curve analyses: positive affect (N = 325)

Estimate S.E Critical ratio (CR) p-value
Positive affect (linear trajectory)
 Intercept 15.96 .269 59.23 ***
 Slope 0.242 .071 3.39 ***
 Intercept ↔ Linear Slope − 1.78 .386 − 5.11 ***
 Variance intercept 20.30 1.853 10.96 ***
 Variance slope 0.75 .117 6.36 ***
χ2 (DF = 14) = 57.56, p < .001; CMIN/DF = 4.11; CFI = .93; TLI = .93; RMSEA = .10
Positive affect (quadratic trajectory)
 Intercept 15.95 .274 58.26 ***
 Slope-Linear 0.39 .193 2.01 .044
 Slope-Quadratic − 0.04 .044 − 0.97 .332
 Intercept ↔ Linear Slope − 4.96 1.038 − 4.78 ***
 Intercept ↔ Quad. Slope 0.82 .229 3.57 ***
 Linear ↔ Quadratic − 0.21 .196 − 1.07 .286
 Variance intercept 20.89 1.918 10.89 ***
 Variance linear slope 2.39 .890 2.69 .007
 Variance quadratic slope − 0.01 .046 − 0.31 .758
χ2 (DF = 10) = 26.70, p < .003; CMIN/DF = 2.67; CFI = .98; TLI = .96; RMSEA = .07

∗∗Represents significant estimates at the 0.01 level

∗∗∗Represents significant estimates at the 0.001 level