Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;27(4):241–248. doi: 10.1007/s10804-020-09365-x

Table 3.

Latent growth curve analyses: negative affect (N = 325)

Estimate S.E Critical ratio
(CR)
p-value
Negative affect (linear trajectory)
 Intercept 7.80 .208 37.59 ***
 Slope 3.69 .262 14.11 ***
 Intercept ↔ Linear Slope − 0.15 1.047 − 0.15 .883
 Variance intercept 10.07 1.127 8.94 ***
 Variance slope 7.74 1.506 5.14 ***
χ2 (DF = 14) = 80.27, p < .001; CMIN/DF = 5.73; CFI = .89; TLI = .88; RMSEA = .12
Negative affect (quadratic trajectory)
 Intercept 7.74 .208 37.28 ***
 Slope-Linear 2.59 .232 11.18 ***
 Slope-Quadratic − 0.47 .058 − 8.05 ***
 Intercept ↔ Linear Slope − 0.03 .887 − 0.04 .970
 Intercept ↔ Quad. Slope − 0.08 .217 − 0.36 .716
 Linear ↔ Quadratic − 0.81 .272 − 2.99 **
 Variance intercept 10.72 1.127 9.51 ***
 Variance linear slope 4.32 1.140 3.79 ***
 Variance quadratic slope 0.16 .068 2.41 .016
χ2 (DF = 10) = 33.65, p < .001; CMIN/DF = 3.37; CFI = .96; TLI = .94; RMSEA = .09

∗∗Represents significant estimates at the 0.01 level

∗∗∗Represents significant estimates at the 0.001 level