Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Radiol. 2020 May 18;129:109067. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109067

Table 2.

US guided DOT clinical trials performed in > 100 subjects.

1 st Author Year Pub. Patients {lesions} Objectives Key Results
Zhu, Qu 2010 162 {173} Differentiating Tis/T1 vs T2–4 cancer vs. benign Thb > 2x greater cancer vs. benign, US-DOT: T1 cancer, sens 92 %, spec 93 %, PPV 81 %, NPV 97 % T2–T4 cancer, sens 75 %, spec 93 %, PPV 69 %, NPV 95 %
THb threshold of 82 μM
Zhu, Qu 2016 288 {297} Quantify THb for a wide range of malignant and benign diseases
Compare breast cancer diagnosis of conventional US, DOT alone and in conjunction with conventional US
Correlation THb, HbO2 and Hb with histologic, nuclear grades
Conventional US and DOT, sens 96.6 %–100 %, spec 77.3 %–83.3 %, PPV 52.7 %–59.4 %, NPV 99.0 %–100 %
THb moderately correlated with tumor histologic grade and nuclear grade; HbO2 moderately correlated with tumor nuclear grade
THb threshold of 80μM
THb lower threshold (THb < 50 μM) was employed, biopsy recommendations for 4A and 4B lesions decreased by an average of 45 %
You, SS 2010 198 {214} THb cancer vs. benign, operating characteristic US-DOT: sens 83.9 %, spec 66.7 %, acc 72.6 %, PPV 75.6 %, NPV 77.1 %
Zhu, Qi 2011 205 {214} 11 % cancers were non-vascular but had elevated THb; 26 % of benign lesions were vascular by color Doppler but low THb
Color Doppler vs. US-DOT THb threshold of 140μM
Kim, MJ 2011 111 {122} Inter-observer agreement Interobserver agreement in BI-RADS final assessment with US and US-DOT (almost perfect; κ = 0.8618) was improved compared with US alone (substantial agreement, κ = 0.6574). AUC under the ROC curve did not show significant differences between US and combined US and US-DOT
Zhi, W 2012 102 {136} Compare conventional US and US-guide DOT in differentiating malignant solid breast lesions vs. benign. US and US-DOT: Sens 100 %, spec 93.9 %, PPV 91.5 %, 100 %, Acc 96.3 %
Zhi, W 2018 447 {455} To investigate THC characteristics and its association with clinical pathologic findings THb significantly greater in ER−, PR− than in ER+, PR + cancers (p = .005 and p = .01, respectively) and that cancers with axillary lymph node metastases or lymphovascular invasion had higher average THb (p = .042 and p = .043, respectively).