. 2020 Oct 23;18(1):35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.008

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes and univariate comparisons between the sexually active (group A) and sexually inactive (group B) subjects during COVID-19 lockdown

Variable	Overall (N = 6,821)	Group A (N = 2,608)	Group B (N = 4,213)	Statistics	Effect size (d or V)
Variable	n (%)/mean ± SD	n (%)/mean ± SD	n (%)/mean ± SD	Statistics	Effect size (d or V)
Anxiety
GAD-7 score	6.78 ± 4.40	6.01 ± 4.23	7.26 ± 4.44	t = −11.626^∗	d = 0.29
Prevalence (%)	1,624 (23.8%)	478 (18.3%)	1,146 (27.2%)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 69.92^∗	V = 0.10
Depression
PHQ-9 score	7.70 ± 5.07	6.73 ± 4.75	8.31 ± 5.17	t = −12.898^∗	d = 0.32
Prevalence (%)	2,045 (30.0%)	596 (22.9%)	1,449 (34.4%)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 102.20^∗	V = 0.12
Dyadic adjustment
Cohesion subscale	15.86 ± 3.93^∗	16.12 ± 3.84^†	15.58 ± 4.00^‡	t = 4.781^∗	d = 0.14
Satisfaction subscale	36.57 ± 7.42^∗	37.00 ± 7.11^†	36.11 ± 7.72^‡	t = 4.113^∗	d = 0.12

∗P < .0001.

^∗

N = 4,757.

^†

N = 2,466.

^‡

N = 2,291.