Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of studies that had no concomitant use of DPPS with LAMS.
| Outcome | LAMS with DPPS use (1) Studies = 5 |
LAMS no DPPS use (2) Studies = 12 |
P
value
1 vs 2 |
DPPS (3) Studies = 26 |
P
value
2 vs 3 |
|||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||
| Safety Outcomes | ||||||||
| Bleeding | 223 | 3.0 % | 518 | 2.2 % | 0.78 | 381 | 4.6 % | 0.35 |
| Perforation | 151 | 0.0 % | 394 | 0.9 % | 0.064 | 287 | 1.1 % | 0.82 |
| Stent migration | 223 | 12.3 % | 565 | 3.7 % | 0.046 | 318 | 6.8 % | 0.29 |
| Stent occlusion | 119 | 3.8 % | 611 | 3.7 % | 0.99 | 239 | 5.2 % | 0.76 |
| Efficacy Outcomes 1 | ||||||||
| Resolution of WON | 151 | 86.4 % | 676 | 88.0 % | 0.85 | 614 | 87.5 % | 0.88 |
CI, confidence interval; LAMS, lumen-apposing metal stents, DPPS, double-pigtail plastic stents; WON, walled-off necrosis.
1
Number of procedures not reported for the five studies of LAMS with concomitant DPPS use.