Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;26:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.010

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The clustered histogram intuitively reflects the interlaboratory differences in the reported microbiota composition in the sample 201901 (A for 16Ss at the genus level and C for SMs at the species level). The number of unexpected bacteria with a relative abundance >0.01% was counted in every laboratory (B for 16Ss at the genus level and D for SMs at the species level). The number on each petal refers to the identified unexpected bacteria for the corresponding laboratory.