Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;20:424. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01827-x

Table 2.

Cognitive Performance, clinical characteristics and glycemic control data of the study sample. MHAS 2012

Cognitive Performance Total Low
≤44.0
Intermediate
44.1–59.52
High
≥59.53
P
Mean (SD)/nn/SD (%) n = 216 n = 76 n = 68 n = 72
Age 68.11 (6.48) 69.75 (6.66)a 68.66 (6.93) 65.86 (5.18) .001*
Female 125 (57.9%) 49 (64.5%) 36 (52.9%) 40 (55.6%) .337
Education level 4.72 (3.96) 2.57 (2.67)ab 4.25 (3.27) 7.44 (4.15) .000*
Smoking history 21 (9.7%) 7 (9.2%) 6 (8.8%) 8 (11.1%) .887
Alcoholism 39 (18.1%) 8 (10.5%)a 19 (27.9%) 12 (16.7%) .023*
Hypertension 149 (69.0%) 54 (71.1%) 49 (72.1%) 46 (63.9%) .519
CVD 4 (1.9%) 3 (3.9%) 1 (1.5%) 0 (0.0%) .199
Obesity 87 (40.3%) 27 (35.5%) 28 (41.2%) 32 (44.4%) .537
Depressive Symptoms 4.76 (1.97) 5.04 (1.91) 4.81 (2.08) 4.43 (1.89) .166
IHD 17 (7.9%) 5 (6.6%) 7 (10.3%) 5 (6.9%) .670
Systolic Pressure 144.67 (21.72) 145.54 (22.83) 147.68 (21.83) 140.93 (20.10) .169
Diastolic Pressure 77.67 (12.20) 76.68 (12.97) 79.75 (12.46) 76.75 (10.96) .237
Heart Rate 76.71 (12.16) 76.28 (12.67) 78.90 (12.75) 75.10 (10.85) .169
PCR 4.68 (7.20) 4.78 (7.28) 4.98 (8.54) 4.30 (5.68) .854
Total Cholesterol 192.64 (41.88) 194.16 (37.94) 196.46 (55.01) 187.50 (29.13) .431
HDL 38.38 (8.81) 36.86 (8.12) 38.60 (9.28) 39.74 (8.93) .144
TSH 3.35 (8.38) 3.64 (11.59) 4.14 (8.35) 2.31 (1.95) .416
Vitamin D 21.13 (6.83) 20.85 (7.40) 20.94 (6.40) 21.60 (6.67) .779
Glycemic Control

 Poor

HbA1c ≥ 8%

103 (47.7%) 41 (54.0%) 36 (52.9%) 26 (36.1%) .166

 Standard

HbA1c 7.0–7.9%

46 (21.3%) 13 (17.1%) 15 (22.1%) 18 (25%)

 Intensive

HbA1c < 7.0%

67 (31.0%) 22 (28.9%) 17 (25%) 28 (38.9%)

Data are presented as means or percentage, ANOVA analysis was performed. CVD Cerebrovascular Disease, IHD Isquemic Heart Disease, PCR Reactive protein-C, HDL High density cholesterol, TSH Stimulating thyroid hormone, HbA1c Glycated hemoglobin, SD Standard Deviation. *p ≤ 0.05. Post-hoc DSM ap < 0.001 Low vs High cognitive performance; bp < 0.001 Low vs Intermediate cognitive performance