Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;20:424. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01827-x

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis in comparison with the reference group

Low Cognitive Performance Intermediate Cognitive Performance
Unadjusted Model Odds Ratio 95% CI p Odds Ratio 95% CI p
Poor Control Group (HbA1c > 8%) 2.01 0.95–4.22 .066 2.28 1.04–5.00 .040*
Standard Control Group (HbA1c 7–7.9%) 0.92 0.37–2.27 .812 1.37 0.55–3.42 .496
Adjusted Model Odds Ratio 95% CI p Odds Ratio 95% CI p
Poor Control Group (HbA1c > 8%) 3.17 1.17–8.60 .024* 3.23 1.27–8.20 .014*
Standard Control Group (HbA1c 7–7.9%) 1.15 0.37–3.62 .812 1.57 0.60–4.41 .391

High cognitive performance and intensive glycemic control were considered as the reference groups. HbA1c: Glycated Hemoglobin. Confounding variables: age, educational level. CI: Confidence Interval. *p ≤ 0.05