Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 24;19:186. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01161-x

Table 4.

Estimating the association between baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and new-onset diabetes evaluated with risk ratio (RR)

ALP, IU/L N No. of events (%) Crude model Adjusted model*
RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value
New-onset diabetes
 Continuous, per SD (30.5 IU/L) increment 14,393 1549 (10.8) 1.06 (1.01,1.12) 0.011 1.06 (1.00,1.12) 0.034
Quartiles
 Q1 (< 79) 3486 343 (9.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
 Q2 (79- < 96) 3623 381 (10.5) 1.07 (0.93,1.24) 0.372 1.09 (0.94,1.26) 0.274
 Q3 (96- < 116) 3577 390 (10.9) 1.12 (0.97,1.29) 0.166 1.12 (0.96,1.30) 0.143
 Q4 (≥ 116) 3707 435 (11.7) 1.19 (1.04,1.38) 0.015 1.21 (1.03,1.41) 0.018
P for trend 0.013 0.019

ALP serum alkaline phosphatase, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, RR risk ratio, SD standard deviations, SBP systolic blood pressure

*Adjusted for age, sex, study center, treatment group, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol drinking, family history of diabetes, SBP, fasting glucose (FG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), eGFR, folate, total homocysteine and the use of antihypertensive drugs at baseline, as well as time-averaged SBP during the treatment period

In comparison with the first quartile