Table 4. Site-specific trait estimates in mm (mean ± SD of the posterior distribution from the model) conditional on site isolation level where they were caught and where the insects were reared.

Site	Isolation level	Reared	Femur	Pronotum	Ovip./Cerci	Wing
Males
KAA	Continuous	Field	13.02 ± 0.14	4.02 ± 0.06	2.74 ± 0.04	8.81 ± 0.19
		Laboratory	12.21 ± 0.16	3.82 ± 0.07	2.67 ± 0.05	8.79 ± 0.20
TAL	Continuous	Field	13.01 ± 0.13	4.09 ± 0.04	2.70 ± 0.04	8.93 ± 0.16
		Laboratory	12.71 ± 0.14	3.96 ± 0.07	2.71 ± 0.05	9.18 ± 0.16
ALA	Isolated	Field	13.79 ± 0.14	4.52 ± 0.05	2.95 ± 0.04	8.90 ± 0.19
		Laboratory	13.02 ± 0.15	4.24 ± 0.07	2.89 ± 0.05	9.15 ± 0.20
VAS	Isolated	Field	13.39 ± 0.11	4.30 ± 0.04	2.98 ± 0.04	8.68 ± 0.14
		Laboratory	13.01 ± 0.13	4.10 ± 0.05	3.03 ± 0.05	8.86 ± 0.15
Females
KAA	Continuous	Field	13.95 ± 0.19	4.40 ± 0.07	5.70 ± 0.09	6.19 ± 0.27
		Laboratory	13.31 ± 0.16	3.86 ± 0.07	5.43 ± 0.11	6.02 ± 0.22
TAL	Continuous	Field	14.07 ± 0.32	4.40 ± 0.14	6.21 ± 0.09	6.16 ± 0.38
		Laboratory	13.73 ± 0.14	4.04 ± 0.06	5.55 ± 0.09	6.39 ± 0.19
ALA	Isolated	Field	15.15 ± 0.12	4.88 ± 0.05	6.29 ± 0.05	6.81 ± 0.16
		Laboratory	14.23 ± 0.14	4.43 ± 0.06	6.08 ± 0.09	6.42 ± 0.20
VAS	Isolated	Field	14.89 ± 0.14	4.72 ± 0.05	6.49 ± 0.06	5.88 ± 0.17
		Laboratory	14.26 ± 0.14	4.43 ± 0.06	6.27 ± 0.08	6.37 ± 0.19

Note:

Consistent with the main results is that: (1) the longer trait length for isolated versus continuous populations in the wild is maintained when the insects are raised under controlled conditions, and (2) these results are consistent and show a high degree of certainty for the femur, pronotum and genital appendage (ovipositor/cerci) traits, and less consistent with a higher degree of uncertainty for the wing trait.