Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;11:2150132720932722. doi: 10.1177/2150132720932722

Table 4.

Logistic Regression.

Variable B SE Wald X2 P OR 95% CI
HBM: Perceived benefits flu vax 0.284 0.207 1.880 .170 1.328 0.885, 1.992
HBM: Perceived barriers flu vax 0.739 0.221 11.164 .001* 2.094 1.357, 3.232
HBM: Flu susceptibility 0.758 0.207 13.476 <.001* 2.135 1.424, 3.200
HBM: Flu severity −0.050 0.181 0.077 .782 0.951 0.667, 1.356
HBM: Flu vax uptake self-efficacy −0.615 0.182 11.477 .001* 0.541 0.379, 0.772
HBM: Flu vax cue to action −0.371 0.213 3.037 .081 0.690 0.455, 1.047
Web link 0.290 0.145 3.975 .046* 1.336 1.005, 1.776
Visual 1.029 0.173 35.429 <.001 2.798 1.994, 3.927
Healthcare professionals promoting flu vax −0.227 0.172 1.746 .186 0.797 0.569, 1.116
Alternative protection 0.606 0.417 2.114 .146 1.833 0.810, 4.149
Specific populations for flu vax −0.343 0.173 3.949 .047* 0.710 0.506, 0.995
*

Significant at P < .05.