Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;12:1758835920963925. doi: 10.1177/1758835920963925

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of cohort A.a

Abemaciclib + NSAI (n = 207) Placebo + NSAI (n = 99)
Age, years, median (range) 54.0 (32.0, 83.0) 54.0 (27.0, 77.0)
Age category
 <65 years 157 (75.8) 83 (83.8)
 ⩾65 years 50 (24.2) 16 (16.2)
Country
 China 164 (79.2) 82 (82.8)
 Brazil 21 (10.1) 8 (8.1)
 India 18 (8.7) 7 (7.1)
 South Africa 4 (1.9) 2 (2.0)
Disease setting
 Locoregionally recurrent 8 (3.9) 7 (7.1)
 De novo metastatic 41 (19.8) 22 (22.2)
 Metastatic recurrent 157 (75.8) 70 (70.7)
Measurable disease
 Yes 176 (85.0) 83 (83.8)
 No (evaluable bone disease only) 31 (15.0) 16 (16.2)
Nature of disease
 Visceral metastases 126 (60.9) 59 (59.6)
 Non-visceral metastases 81 (39.1) 40 (40.4)
Prior (neo)adjuvant ET disease-free interval
 >12 months 87 (42.0) 41 (41.4)
 ⩽12 months 35 (16.9) 20 (20.2)
 No prior ET 83 (40.1) 37 (37.4)
Prior (neo)adjuvant ET
 Aromatase inhibitor containing ET 20 (9.7) 13 (13.1)
 Anti-estrogen therapy onlyb 101 (48.8) 48 (48.5)
 No prior (neo)adjuvant ET 85 (41.1) 38 (38.4)
Prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy
 Yes 140 (67.6) 63 (63.6)
 No 67 (32.4) 36 (36.4)
a

Data are no. (%), unless otherwise stated.

b

One patient in abemaciclib arm used ‘unknown endocrine therapy’ as the reported term and was classified into this category.

ET, endocrine therapy.