Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;28:102450. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102450

Table 3.

Results of the inferential statistics for the response times (RT) analysis per tract.

RT effect by tract integrity b SE t (df) p
RT effect by ILF integrity
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA vs. controls 1.082 0.331 3.27 (4433) 0.001
FDC * Related vs. neutral: controls −0.327 0.143 −2.286 (2344) 0.022
FDC: neutral in controls −0.830 0.412 −2.012 (18) 0.060
FDC: related in controls −1.157 0.467 −2.478 (17) 0.023
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA 0.755 0.255 −2.958 (2090) 0.003
FDC: neutral in PPA 0.395 0.914 0.432 (18) 0.671
FDC: related in PPA 1.291 1.206 1.070 (18) 0.298
RT effect by IFOF integrity
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA vs. controls 0.811 0.377 2.152 (4433) 0.032
FDC * Related vs. neutral: controls 0.145 0.160 0.909 (2344) 0.363
FDC: controls −1.442 0.441 −3.268 (19) 0.004
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA 0.957 0.303 3.153 0.002
FDC: neutral in PPA 0.616 1.063 0.58 0.569
FDC: related in PPA 1.702 1.396 1.219 (18) 0.238
RT effect by UF integrity
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA vs. controls 0.862 0.354 2.437 (4433) 0.015
FDC * Related vs. neutral: controls 0.195 0.147 1.330 (2344) 0.184
FDC: controls −1.004 0.454 −2.212 (18) 0.040
FDC * Related vs. neutral: PPA 1.057 0.296 3.574 (2090) <0.001
FDC: neutral in PPA −0.494 0.994 −0.497 (19) 0.625
FDC: related in PPA 0.687 1.343 0.511 (19) 0.615

Note. Results obtained from the full model, unless stated otherwise. Results from the group models are indicated by . Only when a significant interaction effect was found, this was followed up with subsequent analyses per group or condition. SE = standard error.