Skip to main content
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica logoLink to Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
. 2020 Apr 14;54(3):337–343. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.03.113

Complications after internal screw fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review

Seung-Ju Kim 1,, Hyun-Soo Park 1, Dong-Woo Lee 1
PMCID: PMC7586760  PMID: 32442123

Abstract

Objective

Internal fixation with cannulated screws for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly has substantial reoperation and mortality rates. The selection of either internal fixation or arthroplasty for nondisplaced femoral neck fracture is debatable.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding complications in the internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly (>60 years old) patients. We searched in multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for articles in this area; there was no limitation over the publication year.

Results

A total of 1971 patients were identified from 16 published studies. All these patients were over 60 years old. The minimum follow-up after the surgical procedure was 11 months (range: 11–183 months). A total of 329 fractures (16.7%) with radiographic and clinical failures after fixation were identified with regard to stable femoral neck fractures. The single most common complication after surgery was nonunion (129/329), with a pooled percentage of 39.2%. Osteonecrosis was found to be the second most common cause of revision surgery (31.9%). The overall reoperation rate attributable to surgical complications was 15.2% (300/1971 patients). Conversion to hip arthroplasty was performed in 244 patients (12.4%) after primary fixation.

Conclusion

Our study elucidated further the complication rate of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal screw fixation. Since the failure rate of screw fixation for stable femoral neck fractures in elderly patients is not low, we believe that hemiarthroplasty is a reasonable treatment option in select patients.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Therapeutic study

Keywords: Femoral neck fracture, Nondisplaced, Screw, Fixation, Elderly


There are approximately 312,000 hip fractures occurring annually in the United States population, and it is estimated that there will be 500,000 cases by 2040 (1). The incidence of elderly femoral neck fractures has been rising every year due to an increase in the average life span along with recent developments in medical technology (2). Problems after treating displaced femoral neck fractures have been extensively investigated, but less attention has been paid to nondisplaced fractures, even though the incidence of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is approximately half that of displaced fractures (3).

Although the accepted treatment for nondisplaced hip fractures in young patients is osteosynthesis, this issue still remains highly controversial in the elderly population. Internal fixation is a common surgical intervention for the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly population (4). However, a higher-than-expected number of internal-fixation-related complications have occurred after surgery in elderly patients due to poor bone quality (5, 6). Han et al. reported that the major complication rate of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients over the age of 70 years was as high as 34.6% after an internal fixation operation (7). Several studies have reported that the clinical results of nondisplaced fractures treated by osteosynthesis are not so satisfactory in elderly patients due to the presence of osteonecrosis, nonunion, implant-related complications, or residual pain (6, 8). Nevertheless, our current knowledge regarding complications of internal screw fixation in elderly patients is confined to a few reviews from single institutions or from multicenter national registries from a single country, even though the incidence rates may differ between the patients of different ethnic backgrounds and nationalities.

The present study was designed to evaluate the complication rate of screw fixation for nondisplaced femur neck fractures in elderly patients with a review of the literature and a pooled analysis. Therefore, we asked the following questions. (1) What are the common postoperative complications requiring surgical revisions? (2) What are the overall complications and reoperation rates after fixation?

Materials and Methods

Literature research

We performed a systematic review of the available literature using multiple separate search strategies. Four computer databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched with the phrases “femur neck fracture,” “nondisplaced,” “elderly,” and “fixation” in different combinations. Two independent reviewers separately completed this search, and the results were duplicated two times by each reviewer. The initial search was performed on May 10, 2019, with an update on July 10, 2019, to ensure accuracy. No additional study was identified when the search was repeated.

Selection criteria

The inclusion criteria for the studies were (1) randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort trials, or retrospective comparative studies; (2) English-written articles dealing with human species; (3) electronic publications that reported cases of complication after screw fixation; (4) articles reporting cases with elderly (more than 60 years old) patients; (5) both retrospective and prospective series; and (6) only those articles that investigated the final outcomes, including complications.

The exclusion criteria were (1) biomechanical or animal studies, (2) conference presentations, (3) abstracts only, (4) articles not reporting the postoperative follow-up period and particular complications (3), (5) extracapsular hip fracture [OTA/AO 31-B2.1 (9)], (6) displaced femoral neck fractures, and (7) articles that did not deal with the treatment of postoperative complications (10). Limits for the number of patients in each study or the minimum duration of follow-up were not used, and no limitation was imposed on the publication year. Only published clinical studies were included. Due to the limited evidence available on this topic, case series were also included in our study. For the study period, patients older than 60 years were defined as elderly. Fractures were categorized as nondisplaced if they were AO/OTA 31B3.1-3 (Garden stages I and II) (11).

Study selection

Searching the aforementioned databases yielded a total of 576 articles. A simplified flowchart enumerating this search process is shown in Figure 1. First, PubMed database yielded 259 articles; second, the Web of Science database-using the same search strategy-yielded 81 articles. There were 201 articles that appeared in more than one of the 4 searches, yielding a total of 375 unique articles. Abstracts and full texts of the retrieved articles were independently read by 2 authors, and all the relevant articles were read in their entirety. In addition, the reference lists of the included studies were screened to minimize the risk of missing relevant articles. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was reached through a discussion between both the authors. Stringent exclusion criteria were applied, ultimately yielding 16 appropriate articles. After including prospective studies, most of the larger cohorts giving an answer or at least an insight into the clinical problems were selected for this review. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed (12).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A PRISMA flowchart illustrating the selection of studies included in our systematic review

Data extraction

We used a standard data extraction form to extract the relevant data from the eligible articles. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. If necessary, we contacted the corresponding authors of the included studies to ensure that the information was integrated as well as to retrieve missing data, if any. The following data were extracted. Level of evidence of the included studies, demographics (age and gender), underlying disease, classification of fractures (Garden stages), time to surgery after admission, follow-up period, intervention (technique and treatment protocol), outcomes subsequent to the treatment such as clinical union and postoperative complications, and mortality after surgery. As the measurements of the patient characteristics and outcomes were consistent among the trials, we pooled these data to determine the mean values. The pooling of the functional assessment datasets was not attempted because of significant variability in the criteria.

Results

Search results and studies included

Our systematic literature review from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library literature searches revealed a total of 1971 patients from 16 selected articles that were reported from 1996 to 2019, including two prospective studies (5, 13). Although complete data were not available, data such as age, gender, underlying medical/surgical conditions, and postoperative complications were collected. Age, mean follow-up time, and treatment outcomes were clearly identified in all the reports.

Demography

The patients who were treated for femur neck fractures between 1983 and 2015 were included in the present study. The mean age of the patients was 78.7 years (range: 60–106 years). The minimum follow-up period after the surgical procedure was 11 months (range: 11–183 months). A vast majority of the patients were female (female/male: 977/515). Two papers did not indicate the gender distributions (6, 11). It was difficult to analyze the time to surgery after admission due to reporting inconsistencies. Demographic information is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic information in the studies (NA: not available)

Author Journal Year Study period Country Number of patients Male/Female Mean age
Dolatowski et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 2012–2015 Norway 111 27/84 83.2
Lu et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017 2008–2010 China 41 12/29 85.85
Han et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016 2002–2008 Korea 52 14/38 77.6
Min et al. Hip Pelvis 2016 2008–2014 Korea 25 5/20 72.3
Kang et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2016 1996–2013 Korea 81 27/54 73.1
Kain et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014 2005–2008 USA 121 NA 80
Kim et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014 1999–2011 Korea 58 18/40 77.5
Kim et al. Hip Pelvis 2014 2007–2010 Korea 33 12/21 77
Manohara et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2014 2004–2008 Singapore 100 23/77 78
Murphy et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013 1998–2009 USA 358 NA 81
Parker et al. Injury 2008 1989–2002 UK 346 102/244 80.8
Bjørgul et al. Acta Orthopaedica 2007 1998–2003 Norway 225 64/161 80.4
Yih-Shiunn et al. International Orthopaedics 2007 1997–2003 Taiwan 84 35/49 71.6
Shimizu et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007 1983–2002 Japan 49 8/41 75.4
Chen et al. The Journal of TRAUMA 2005 1996–2001 China 37 15/22 83.76
Chiu et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996 1983–1992 Taiwan 250 153/97 73

NA: not available

Treatment outcomes

All the trials reported postoperative complications such as nonunion, subsequent osteonecrosis, implant failure, and peri-implant fractures. Overall, there were a total of 329 fractures (16.7%) with radiographic and clinical failures after fixation for a stable femoral neck fracture. Nonunion (129/329) was determined to be the most common reason for reoperation in patients with nondisplaced fractures treated with internal fixation, where the pooled percentage was 39.2%. Osteonecrosis was the second most common cause of revision surgery (Table 2). The overall reoperation rate attributable to surgical complications was 15.2% (300 patients). Conversion to hip arthroplasty was performed in 244 patients (12.4%) after primary fixation (Table 3). The 1-year follow-up mortality rates were reported by 6 studies: these values ranged from 1.2% to 23%. Clinical outcomes assessed by the patient-reported outcomes were inconsistently reported, making the interpretation of these data challenging.

Table 2.

Postoperative complications

Author Nonunion Osteonecrosis Implant failure Peri-implant fracture Deep infection Others (Osteoarthritis, local pain)
Dolatowski et al. 10 7 7 1 1 0
Lu et al. 3 4 3 0 0 0
Han et al. 8 6 1 2 1 0
Min et al. 1 1 0 1 0 0
Kang et al. 4 6 4 0 0 0
Kain et al. 6 3 4 2 0 3
Kim et al. 0 4 1 0 0 0
Kim et al. 0 1 6 2 0 0
Manohara et al. 3 5 0 0 0 0
Murphy et al. 20 9 19 6 0 0
Parker et al. 38 13 0 2 0 0
Bjørgul et al. 16 10 7 2 1 6
Yih-Shiunn et al. 2 8 3 0 0 0
Shimizu et al. 2 6 0 0 0 0
Chen et al. 1 4 1 0 0 0
Chiu et al. 15 18 9 0 0 0
Total (%) 129 (39.2) 105 (31.9) 65 (19.7) 18 (5.4) 3 (0.9) 9 (2.7)

Table 3.

Reoperations

Author Number of patients Reoperation Convertion to arthroplasty One-year mortaility (%)
Dolatowski et al. 111 22 12 25 (23)
Lu et al. 41 8 7 NA
Han et al. 52 16 15 2 (3.8)
Min et al. 25 3 2 NA
Kang et al. 81 5 5 1 (1.2)
Kain et al. 121 16 12 NA
Kim et al. 58 4 4 4 (6.9)
Kim et al. 33 8 6 NA
Manohara et al. 100 8 8 4 (4.0)
Murphy et al. 358 54 43 NA
Parker et al. 346 50 37 NA
Bjørgul et al. 225 42 36 22 (9.8)
Yih-Shiunn et al. 84 8 8 NA
Shimizu et al. 49 8 8 NA
Chen et al. 37 6 6 NA
Chiu et al. 250 42 35 NA
Total (%) 1971 300 (15.2) 244 (12.4)

NA: not available

Discussion

For Garden stage I or II femoral neck fractures in patients less than 65 years old, internal fixation is generally preferred. However, the treatment method for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains debatable and is often surgeon-dependent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the failure rate of internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with a pooled analysis of the reported cases.

The most common early postoperative complications occurring after the fixation of stable femur neck fractures are nonunion and failure of fixation (14, 15). The known risk factors for nonunion are screw fixation in a triangular configuration, displaced fracture, borderline and unacceptable reduction, and increased screw-shaft subchondral purchase over the femoral neck (16). Parker et al. demonstrated that increasing age and female sex were the primary risk factors for healing complications after femoral neck fractures due to osteoporosis (17). A number of studies have noted osteoporosis and age as risk factors for nonunion (16). In our pooled analysis, we have confirmed that the single most common complication after multiple screw fixation in elderly patients was nonunion (pooled percentage: 39.2%). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is also a well-known complication of femur neck fractures, which is caused by alterations in the blood supply; it often develops 2–3 years after treatment (14). Therefore, follow-up should be maintained for at least 2 years after fixation, allowing the detection and treatment of avascular necrosis (15). Notably, it seems that younger patients exhibit greater vulnerability toward osteonecrosis of the femoral head than older individuals because patients aged ≤70 years were at an increased risk of developing osteonecrosis after nondisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with percutaneous screws (18, 19).

Despite these complications, internal fixation remains the conventional treatment of choice for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures even in elderly patients (20). It has several advantages over endoprosthetic replacement because it is less invasive and cost-effective (21). Chen et al. demonstrated that the overall union rate was 94.59% (35 patients) at 6 months after primary internal fixation in patients older than 80 years (22). Min et al. reported that a satisfactory level of bone union (96.0%) was achieved by performing internal fixation in patients over 65 years of age with stable femoral neck fractures (23). Internal fixation is a less invasive technique than arthroplasty and may be expected to reduce the mortality rate.

On the contrary, although the prognosis of stable fractures is favorable, the complication rate in elderly patients is not low and the frequency of reoperation is higher than that in arthroplasty (3, 24, 25). The failure rate of osteosynthesis is reported to be as high as ~20–35% in femoral neck fractures due to osteonecrosis, nonunion, and fixation failure; further, postoperative ambulation might be delayed in this population due to difficulty in achieving firm fixation (7, 26). This risk is greater for superaged patients, for whom the mortality rate after such a fracture is also higher. According to our systematic review, there were a total of 329 fractures (16.7%) with radiographic and clinical failures after fixation for a stable femoral neck fracture, and the overall reoperation rate attributable to surgical complications was 15.2%. Our data confirmed the current literature data according to which a higher-than-expected number of internal-fixation-related complications occur after surgery in elderly patients. There are numerous different opinions on the risk factors that cause such complications in internal fixation. Displacement, insufficient reductions, and severe osteoporosis could be the common causes of complications (7, 27). In particular, elderly Asian women have low bone density as compared to westerners, which may be a risk factor that can lead to osteoporotic fractures and show higher possibilities of nonunion and fixation failure after femoral neck fractures (28).

Successful management requires the surgeon to balance the potential risks and healthcare costs associated with surgery in the cases of femur neck fractures. One of these risks is reoperation. The reoperation rate after nondisplaced fracture treatment in elderly patients is a matter of concern and can lead to multiple hazards. Higher reoperation rates have been associated with the use of fixation in femur neck fractures, resulting in costlier treatments than those in hemiarthroplasty (29, 30). In the present study, the overall reoperation rate attributable to surgical complications was 15.2%. Therefore, in contemporary studies, increasing evidence supports the use of hemiarthroplasty over internal fixation in the elderly population in cases of stable femur neck fractures (5, 11). Dolatowski et al. demonstrated that elderly patients with a nondisplaced femoral neck fracture may benefit from being treated with latest-generation hemiarthroplasty rather than screw fixation (13). Hemiarthroplasty with less postoperative complications, low reoperation rate, and better function recovery at an early stage provides a worthwhile choice of treatment for elderly patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (5). According to a recent meta-analysis study, there were no significant difference with respect to mortality rates for mid- or long-term follow-ups between internal fixation and arthroplasty (31). Furthermore, fixation is known to be associated with a higher risk of contralateral hip fracture than that in arthroplasty (32). Further multicenter studies are needed to establish objective treatment guidelines for stable femur neck fractures in superaged patients.

Our study has several limitations. First, most of the included studies were retrospective in nature, resulting in unavoidable reporting bias. Only 2 prospective cohort studies assessing a total of 152 patients were included in our systematic review. In addition, a few patients with short-term follow-up (the minimum follow-up period was 11 months) were included in our study. Second, although we utilized a systematic methodology that we believe could be reproducible, it may be possible that different search terms and data sources would have provided additional studies that could have met the selection criteria. Because most of the studies comprised patients with both nondisplaced and displaced fractures, it was difficult to isolate the data regarding nondisplaced fractures. Therefore, we established strict selection and exclusion criteria to reduce selection bias as much as possible. A strictly designed and adequately powered randomized controlled trial in the future is essential.

Conclusion

Based on this systematic review, the overall failure rate of internal fixation for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients was not low. The reasons for this higher frequency of reoperation may be related to poor bone quality, patient age, and certain technical factors. Although multiple screw fixation has been recommended in the literature for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures, we believe primary arthroplasty may be a better option for the treatment of nondisplaced fractures in select elderly patients. Additional prospective studies with the involvement of a larger number of patients with stable femur neck fractures (so that a wide range of ethnic backgrounds can be included) will help improve our ability to avoid devastating outcomes.

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • The failure rate of internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures in elderly patients is not low.

  • The reoperation rate attributable to surgical complications was 15.2%.

  • Primary arthroplasty may be a better option for nondisplaced fractures in select elderly patients.

Footnotes

Author Contributions: Concept - S.J.K., H.S.P.; Design - H.S.P., D.W.L.; Supervision - S.J.K., H.S.P.; Resources - S.J.K., D.W.L.; Materials - S.J.K., D.W.L.; Data Collection and/or Processing - H.S.P., D.W.L.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - H.S.P., D.W.L.; Literature Search - S.J.K., D.W.L.; Writing Manuscript - S.J.K., D.W.L.; Critical Review - S.J.K, H.S.P.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • 1.Healy WL, Iorio R. Total hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:43–8. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150273.13949.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA. Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:677–82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gjertsen JE, Fevang JM, Matre K, Vinje T, Engesaeter LB. Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:268–74. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Outcome of undisplaced and moderately displaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:498–504. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu Q, Tang G, Zhao X, Guo S, Cai B, Li Q. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: A 5-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2591-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kain MS, Marcantonio AJ, Iorio R. Revision surgery occurs frequently after percutaneous fixation of stable femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:4010–4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3957-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han SK, Song HS, Kim R, Kang SH. Clinical results of treatment of garden type 1 and 2 femoral neck fractures in patients over 70-year old. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:191–6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0528-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clement ND, Green K, Murray N, Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM. Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: predicting fixation failure and mortality. A prospective study of 162 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:578–85. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0400-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lagerby M, Asplund S, Ringqvist I. Cannulated screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures. No difference between Uppsala screws and Richards screws in a randomized prospective study of 268 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:387–91. doi: 10.3109/17453679808999052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Toh EM, Sahni V, Acharya A, Denton JS. Management of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly; is it time to rethink our strategy? Injury. 2004;35:125–9. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00422-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murphy DK, Randell T, Brennan KL, Probe RA, Brennan ML. Treatment and displacement affect the reoperation rate for femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2691–702. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3020-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dolatowski FC, Frihagen F, Bartels S, et al. Screw fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:136–44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, Koval KJ. Femoral neck fractures: current management. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:121–9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu DF, Bi FG, Ma CY, Wen ZF, Cai XZ. A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0528-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:61–9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parker MJ, Raghavan R, Gurusamy K. Incidence of fracture-healing complications after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:175–9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180325a42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Novoa-Parra CD, Perez-Ortiz S, Lopez-Trabucco RE, Blas-Dobon JA, Rodrigo-Perez JL, Lizaur-Utrilla A. Factors associated with the development of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after non-displaced femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2019;63:233–8. doi: 10.1016/j.recote.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA, Vrahas MS. Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult. J Trauma. 2010;68:236–42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c428ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Manohara R, Liang S, Huang D, Krishna L. Cancellous screw fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014;22:282–6. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shimizu T, Miyamoto K, Masuda K, et al. The clinical significance of impaction at the femoral neck fracture site in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:515–21. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0358-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen WC, Yu SW, Tseng IC, Su JY, Tu YK, Chen WJ. Treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2005;58:1035–9. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000169292.83048.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Min BW, Lee KJ, Bae KC, Lee SW, Lee SJ, Choi JH. Result of Internal Fixation for Stable Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients. Hip Pelvis. 2016;28:43–8. doi: 10.5371/hp.2016.28.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sikand M, Wenn R, Moran CG. Mortality following surgery for undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures. Injury. 2004;35:1015–9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim YC, Lee JY, Song JH, Oh S. The result of in situ pinning for valgus impacted femoral neck fractures of patients over 70 years old. Hip Pelvis. 2014;26:263–8. doi: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.4.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nicolaides V, Galanakos S, Mavrogenis AF, et al. Arthroplasty versus internal fixation for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2011;6:7–12. doi: 10.1007/s11751-010-0099-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kang JS, Jeon YS, Ahn CH, Roh TH. Osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in Asian elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:264. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1123-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, et al. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:185–94. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hui AC, Anderson GH, Choudhry R, Boyle J, Gregg PJ. Internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced fractures of the femoral neck in octogenarians. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:891–4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.76B6.7983113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alolabi B, Bajammal S, Shirali J, Karanicolas PJ, Gafni A, Bhandari M. Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A cost-benefit analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:442–6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817614dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang J, Yang CH, Lin Q, Yun XD, Xia YY. Does arthroplasty provide better outcomes than internal fixation at mid- and long-term follow-up? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2672–9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4345-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Souder CD, Brennan ML, Brennan KL, Song J, Williams J, Chaput C. The rate of contralateral proximal femoral fracture following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning compared with arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:418–25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica are provided here courtesy of Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

RESOURCES