Table 1.
Formulations of the different films assessed.
| Polymer | Filler Type | Content (wt.%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHA | PHA | None | 0 |
| PHA + 1% CNC | PHA | CNC | 1 |
| PHA + 2% CNC | PHA | CNC | 2 |
| PHA + 3% CNC | PHA | CNC | 3 |
| PHA + 10% MF | PHA | MF | 10 |
| PHA + 20% MF | PHA | MF | 20 |
| PHA + 30% MF | PHA | MF | 30 |
| PLA | PLA | None | 0 |
| PLA + 1% CNC | PLA | CNC | 1 |
| PLA + 2% CNC | PLA | CNC | 2 |
| PLA + 3% CNC | PLA | CNC | 3 |
| PLA + 10% MF | PLA | MF | 10 |
| PLA + 20% MF | PLA | MF | 20 |
| PLA + 30% MF | PLA | MF | 30 |
Sample preparation for each type of filler used, either cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) or microfibers (MF), followed different routes.