Table 3.
Combination |
P. digitatum ITEM 9569 |
P. italicum ITEM 9571 |
B. cinerea ITEM 5154 |
A. alternata ITEM 4215 |
M. laxa CBS 101507 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTO: THY-CYM-TER | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a |
1: THY-TER | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a |
2: THY-CYM | 72.6 ± 7.9 c | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a |
3: CYM-TER | 80.9 ± 8.2 b | n.d. | 40.3 ± 3.6 b | n.d. | 26.1 ± 2.3 c |
THY | 61.8 ± 4.3 d | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a | 100.0 ± 0.0 a |
CYM | 69.5 ± 5.9 c | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 32.3 ± 3.4 b |
TER | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
n.d.: not detected (growth not different from control); One way-ANOVA was applied to estimate the effect of different essential oil compound (EOC) combinations on fungal biomass reduction; the least significant difference (LSD) values (p ≤ 0.05) were calculated to separate mean values for each strain: P. digitatum, 3.3%; B. cinerea, 2.8%; M. laxa, 0.9%; P. italicum and A. alternata, 0%. Mean values with different lowercase letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).