Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;99(2):1028–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.008

Table 6.

The effect of diets with different Arg and Met content on the physicochemical properties of breast meat in turkeys at 16 wk of age.

Item Crude protein, % Color2
pH24
L* a* b*
Treatment1
 Arg90Met30 24.9 58.7 5.49 11.6 5.97
 Arg90Met45 25.1 58.7 5.39 11.9 5.66
 Arg100Met30 24.9 61.1 5.20 12.1 5.72
 Arg100Met45 25.0 60.0 5.04 11.6 5.71
 Arg110Met30 24.9 60.0 5.15 11.4 5.71
 Arg110Met45 25.2 58.9 5.10 11.6 5.73
 SEM 0.054 0.370 0.092 0.137 0.044
Arg level, %
 90 250 58.7 5.44 11.8 5.81
 100 25.0 60.5 5.12 11.8 5.71
 110 25.1 59.4 5.13 11.5 5.72
Met level, %
 30 24.9 59.9 5.28 11.7 5.80
 45 25.1 59.2 5.18 11.7 5.70
P value
 Arg 0.759 0.137 0.300 0.572 0.557
 Met 0.204 0.335 0.583 0.982 0.245
 Arg × Met 0.815 0.801 0.973 0.467 0.219

Abbreviations: Arg, arginine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; SEM, standard error of mean.

1

Treatment: Arg90Met30 received 90% Arg level and 30% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys; Arg90Met45 received 90% Arg level and 45% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys; Arg100Met30 received 100% Arg level and 30% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys; Arg100Met45 received 100% Arg level and 45% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys; Arg110Met30 received 110% Arg level and 30% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys; Arg110Met45 received 110% Arg level and 45% Met level relative to the content of dietary Lys.

2

L*: lightness, lower values indicate a darker color; a*: redness, higher positive values indicate a higher contribution of redness; b*: yellowness, higher positive values indicate a higher contribution of yellowness.