Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;99(2):1174–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.048

Table 2.

Differences in the compositional of cecal microbiome of the HSST and LSST groups.

Taxon Relative abundance %
SEM P value1
LSST HSST
Phylum (%)
 Firmicutes 86.90 92.24 4.75 0.048*
 Bacteroidetes 2.42 1.33 0.05 0.013*
 FB ratio 38.04 57.61 4.22 0.036
 Actinobacteria 5.18 2.22 1.28 0.143
 Proteobacteria 1.98 3.68 0.86 0.204
 Cyanobacteria 1.62 1.26 0.28 0.732
 Acidobacteria 0.62 0.03 0.24 0.134
Genus (%)
 Lactobacillus 70.85 92.56 6.46 0.050*
 Bifidobacterium 2.69 5.87 1.87 0.047
 Lactococcus 1.43 2.39 0.69 0.384
 Enterococcus 0.61 2.03 0.70 0.223
 Streptococcus 0.57 0.32 0.03 0.345
 Sphingomonas 0.14 0.10 0.04 0.798
 Acinetobacter 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.001**
 Corynebacterium 4.50 1.74 1.95 0.058
 Thermus 2.53 4.97 1.56 0.336
 Bacteroides 2.64 0.50 0.08 0.236
 Clostridium 0.13 0.66 0.03 0.316

All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of the percentage of domain bacteria at taxonomic levels (phylum and genus).

Sampling (n = 8 for HSST and n = 10 for LSST).

Abbreviations: HSST, high activity of SST with long duration of fertility; LSST, low activity of SST short duration of fertility.

1

The P values were determined using Welch's t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).