Table 3.

Effects of dietary treatments on the egg components of Shaver white and ISA brown breeders.¹

Items		Albumen		Yolk		Eggshell
		%	g	%	g	%	g
Strain	Diet
ISA brown	CON2	63.45	36.88	26.44	15.39	10.11	5.88
ISA brown	DMA3	64.05	39.21	25.77	15.77	10.18	6.23
ISA brown	FFF4	64.04	37.08	25.65	14.84	10.30	5.97
Shaver white	CON	63.41	35.98	26.73	15.10	9.87	5.58
Shaver white	DMA	62.82	36.15	27.02	15.52	10.26	5.89
Shaver white	FFF	64.48	36.32	25.36	14.27	10.15	5.72
SEM		0.673	1.022	0.645	0.431	0.187	0.154
Main effect
Strain
ISA brown		63.85	37.72	25.95	15.33	10.20	6.03a
Shaver white		63.57	36.15	26.37	14.96	10.10	5.73b
SEM		0.476	0.565	0.381	0.356	0.108	0.089
Diet
CON		63.43	36.43	26.58	15.24	9.99	5.73
DMA		63.43	37.68	26.39	15.65	10.22	6.06
FFF		64.26	36.70	25.51	14.56	10.23	5.84
SEM		0.476	0.700	0.472	0.316	0.132	0.109
Probabilities (P value)
Strain		0.616	0.053	0.441	0.297	0.509	0.023
Diet		0.373	0.411	0.220	0.052	0.352	0.099
Strain × diet		0.462	0.428	0.503	0.924	0.680	0.963

Values with uncommon superscripts within each column are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Abbreviation: SEM, standard error of the mean.

¹Data are means of 16 egg samples per each treatment.

²Control.

³Microalgae (Aurantiochytrium limacinum) fermentation product, as a source of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

⁴Coextruded full-fat flaxseed and pulse mixture (FFF, 1:1 wt/wt), as a source of α-linolenic acid (ALA).