Table 6.
Item | Treatment1 |
Statistical parameters |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | BSR1.5 | BSR2 | BSR2.5 | SEM | P value, C vs. BSR | Linear | Quadratic | |
Breast muscle | ||||||||
Proportion in the chilled carcass, % | 20.2 | 21.9 | 22.1 | 22.4 | 0.11 | 0.134 | 0.145 | 0.201 |
pH24 | 6.02 | 6.15 | 6.18 | 6.23 | 0.07 | 0.287 | 0.109 | 0.217 |
WHC, % | 13.3d | 15.7c | 16.5 | 17.2a | 0.05 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.326 |
Cooking losses, % | 22.5a | 18.6b | 15.4c | 15.9c | 0.27 | 0.024 | 0.019 | 0.132 |
Shear force, N | 32.4 | 31.8 | 32.6 | 31.9 | 0.46 | 0.128 | 0.243 | 0.147 |
Color parameters | ||||||||
L* | 54.3 | 54.9 | 55.6 | 57.1 | 0.48 | 0.148 | 0.457 | 0.261 |
a* | 10.4a | 9.9a,b | 9.5b | 9.6b | 0.07 | 0.033 | 0.024 | 0.196 |
b* | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 12.7 | 0.11 | 0.089 | 0.078 | 0.154 |
Drumstick muscle | ||||||||
Proportion in the chilled carcass, % | 17.44b | 17.42b | 19.41a | 19.28a | 0.21 | 0.037 | 0.042 | 0.138 |
pH24 | 6.54 | 6.61 | 6.72 | 6.68 | 0.05 | 0.264 | 0.217 | 0.315 |
WHC, % | 12.7c | 13.5b,c | 15.4a | 14.6b | 0.09 | 0.029 | 0.043 | 0.229 |
Cooking losses, % | 20.8a | 17.6b | 18.4b | 17.9b | 0.21 | 0.031 | 0.025 | 0.278 |
Shear force, N | 30.1 | 29.8 | 29.9 | 30.6 | 0.34 | 0.287 | 0.145 | 0.098 |
Color parameters | ||||||||
L* | 47.8 | 47.5 | 48.3 | 48.6 | 3.18 | 0.264 | 0.119 | 0.367 |
a* | 15.6 | 15.4 | 15.9 | 16.2 | 1.24 | 0.128 | 0.248 | 0.438 |
b* | 9.51 | 9.78 | 9.67 | 9.93 | 0.07 | 0.091 | 0.078 | 0.248 |
Data represent the mean of 10 broiler chickens per treatment.
a, b, cSignificantly different at P < 0.05.
Abbreviations: pH24, pH at 24 h postmortem; SEM, standard error of the mean; WHC, water-holding capacity.
Treatments: C = control diet without Boswellia serrata supplementation; BSR1.5 = diet with 1.5% Boswellia serrata supplementation; BSR2 = diet with 2% Boswellia serrata supplementation; BSR2.5 = diet with 2.5% Boswellia serrata supplementation.