Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;99(3):1444–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.064

Table 6.

Feed intake and production performance responses in White Shaver laying hens during phase 1 (20 to 27 wk) and 2 (28 to 46 wk) fed a low crude protein diet with varying levels of L-Ile compared to a control (CON).

Item Feed intake (g/D) Hen-day egg production (%) Egg weight (g) Egg mass (g) Feed conversion ratio
Phase 1
 CON 97 97.6a 51.7a,b 50.6a 1.93
 Ile70 95 94.3b 51.3a,b 48.6b 1.99
 Ile80 98 93.8b 51.5a,b 48.6b 2.05
 Ile90 96 95.4a,b 52.1a 49.9a,b 1.97
 Ile100 96 97.6a 51.1b 49.8a,b 1.95
 SEM 0.789 0.760 0.205 0.425 0.031
 P-value 0.211 <0.001 0.004 0.003 0.097
Contrasts (P-value)
 CON vs. Ile70 0.124 0.003 0.114 <0.001 0.231
 CON vs. Ile80 0.492 <0.001 0.443 0.001 0.011
 Linear 0.493 0.005 0.782 0.035 0.387
 Quadratic 0.126 0.039 0.002 0.960 0.183
Phase 2
 CON 114a 99.2a,b 58.2a 57.5 1.98a,b
 Ile70 113a,b 97.7c 58.6a 57.2 1.98a,b
 Ile80 116a 98.1b,c 58.0a,b 57.0 2.05a
 Ile90 110b 99.6a 58.2a 58.0 1.90c
 Ile100 111b 99.1a,b 57.3b 56.7 1.95b,c
 SEM 0.967 0.302 0.210 0.325 0.020
 P-value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.001 0.058 <0.0001
Contrasts (P-value)
 CON vs. Ile70 0.739 <0.001 0.195 0.416 0.804
 CON vs. Ile80 0.119 0.013 0.558 0.216 0.013
 Linear <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.695 0.002
 Quadratic 0.043 0.003 0.138 0.006 0.001

a–cValues are statistically significant (P < 0.05).