Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;99(3):1598–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.024

Table 4.

Effects of storage time and packaging method on lipid oxidation (mg/kg) in roast chicken meat at 4°C.

Storage time (D) MDA (mg/kg)
A M P
0 1.72 ± 0.06a 1.84 ± 0.42a 1.53 ± 0.19a
6 3.44 ± 0.15A,b 2.07 ± 0.08B,ab 1.54 ± 0.11C,a
12 3.55 ± 0.20A,b 2.12 ± 0.28B,ab 1.70 ± 0.28B,ab
18 4.55 ± 0.67A,c 2.44 ± 0.50B,b 2.16 ± 0.19B,bc
24 ND 2.72 ± 0.19A,bc 2.21 ± 0.20B,bc
30 ND 3.11 ± 0.13A,c 2.29 ± 0.12B,c
P values
Treatment <0.0001
Storage time <0.0001
Treatment × storage time <0.0001

A-CValues with different uppercase letters within the same sampling day were significantly different, and a-cvalues with different lowercase letters in superscripts, within different storage time, were significantly different (P < 0.05).

A, roast chicken meat under air-packaging; M, roast chicken samples sealed in MAP with CO2/N2 (40%/60%); P, roast chicken samples sealed in MAP (CO2/N2 = 40%/60%) with 0.5% grape seed extract solution. Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean (n = 3).

Abbreviations: MAP, modified atmosphere packaging; MDA, malondialdehyde; ND, not detected.