Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0241213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241213

Table 4. Association of baseline and follow-up sTNF-R1 measurements with cardiovascular mortality estimated by using Cox regression models.

Adjusted cause-specific HR (95% CI) Model 1 Adjusted cause-specific HR (95% CI) Model 2 Adjusted cause-specific HR (95% CI) Model 3 Adjusted cause-specific HR (95% CI) Model 4 Adjusted cause-specific H (95% CI)
Model 5 With CRP/IL-6
All Subjects Baseline sTNF-R1 1.22 (0.5–3.0) 1.15 (0.5–2.9) 1.25 (0.5–3.1) 1.26 (0.5–3.2) 1.70 (0.6–4.9)
Follow-up sTNF-R1 2.76 (1.4–5.3) 2.76 (1.4–5.5) 3.76 (1.8–8.1) 4.13 (1.8–9.6) 2.93 (1.1–7.9)
Subjects without signs of acute inflammation * Baseline sTNF-R1 0.70 (0.3–2.0) 0.60 (0.2–1.6) 0.60 (0.2–1.8) 0.60 (0.2–1.8) 0.9 (0.3–2.7)
Follow-up sTNF-R1 5.33 (2.4–11.9) 4.93 (2.2–11.1) 9.5 (3.6–25.2) 8.7 (3.2–23.7) 6.5 (2.2–19.1)

Baseline and Follow-up measurements were included in each model. Model 1 is adjusted for age, sex. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex and lifestyle risk factors: BMI, smoking, physical activity. Model 3 is adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities: GFR value, hypertension, myocardial infarction (self-reported), diabetes mellitus 2, chronic heart failure, cancer, rheumatism and medication intake. Model 4 is adjusted for age, sex, lifestyle risk factors and comorbidities. Model 5 is adjusted for all covariates in Model 4 and additionally adjusted for IL-6, hsCRP, triglycerides, total, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. HR Hazard Ratio, CI Confidence Interval. Bold indicates statistical significance.

*All subjects with hsCRP values > 10 mg/L at either baseline or follow-up or both were excluded.