Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;7(4):125–133. doi: 10.1159/000509824

Table 3.

Comparison of clinically relevant parameters between the initial curative treatment and the initial TACE groups

Curative treatment (N = 71) TACE (N = 97) p value
Child-Pugh scorea
 A5 66 85 0.31b
 A6 4 9
 B7 1 3
HBs Aga
 Negative 16 (23%) 44 (45%) 0.003b
 Positive 54 (77%) 53 (55%)
 Unknown 1
Anti-HCVa
 Negative 56 (84%) 67 (69%) 0.044b
 Positive 11 (16%) 30 (31%)
 Unknown 4
Tumor size, cm 2.5±0.9 2.8±0.9 0.028c
Total bilirubin 0.69±0.28 0.82±0.36 0.032c
Albumin 4.4±0.4 4.1±0.4 <0.0001c
Prothrombin time 10.9±0.6 11.3±0.8 0.0001c
Platelet (×10−3) 184±58 138±58 <0.0001c
FIB-4 1.8±1.0 4.0±3.0 <0.0001c
AFP 576±1,378 852±2,748 0.121c
AST 37±20 50±34 0.001c
ALT 48±28 54±40 0.710c

TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4.

a

The numbers for Child-Pugh score, HBs Ag, and Anti-HCV were numbers of patients.

b

Compared by Fisher's exact test.

c

Compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.