Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;12(10):2431. doi: 10.3390/polym12102431

Table 3.

Data extracted from the DSC curves of the EPDM rubber composites.

Sample. Tg1
(°C)
Tm1
(°C)
ΔHm1
(J g−1)
Tg2
(°C)
Tm2
(°C)
ΔHm2
(J g−1)
Tcr
(°C)
ΔHcr
(J g−1)
Tcc (h1)
(°C)
ΔHcc
(J g−1)
E-S −39 52 8.71 −44 40 17.26 15 −23.84 27 −1.47
E-S-150 −37 54 8.27 −42 45 16.18 22 −21.22 31 −2.37
E-B-S −40 53 9.07 −41 36 13.69 16 −13.41 25 −2.51
E-B-S-150 −37 53 9.44 −39 45 13.16 23 −13.73 25 −2.84
E-Cl-B-S −36 48 13.79 −43 42 12.92 17 −16.82
E-Cl-B-S-150 −31 53 5.17 −40 47 7.25 22 −8.96 28 −1.16
E-Br-B-S −40 52 7.42 −39 41 11.88 20 −13.5 27 −1.40
E-Br-B-S-150 −34 55 6.80 −36 49 11.17 26 −12.74 29 −1.86

h1—first heating scan; h2—second heating scan; Tg1—glass transition domain temperature recorded on the first heating scan; Tg2—glass transition domain temperature recorded on the second heating scan; Tm1—melting temperature recorded on the first heating scan; Tm2—melting temperature recorded on the second heating scan; Tcr—crystallization temperature; Tcc—cold crystallization temperature; ΔHm1—enthalpy of the melting profile recorded on the first heating scan; ΔHm2—enthalpy of the melting profile recorded on the second heating scan; ΔHcr—crystallization enthalpy; ΔHcc—cold crystallization enthalpy.