Table 5.
Analysis of articles included in the systematic review.
| Author, Year | Title, Journal | Material | Luting Agent in Cementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabbri et al. (2014) [51] | Clinical evaluation of 860 anterior and posterior lithium disilicate restorations: Retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 3 years and a maximum observational period of 6 years The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate |
Restoration: HF 20 sec. 4.5% (IPS ceramic gel) Monobond S. Optibond FL Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 37% 30 sec. Optibond FL Fluid composite resin (Gradia Direct Flow; Tetric EvoFlow) or dual cure composite systems (Variolink II) |
| Federlin et al. (2010) [61] | Controlled, prospective clinical split-mouth study of cast gold vs. ceramic partial crowns: 5.5 year results American Journal of Dentistry |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM (Vita 3D Master CEREC Mark II) |
Dual cure composite cement (Variolink IIg/high viscosity) |
| D’Arcangelo et al. (2014) [50] | Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth Clin Oral Invest |
Composite |
Restoration: EnaBond light-curing Aluminum oxide powder 50 μm Tooth: Immediate dentin sealing Orthophosphoric ac. 37% 30 sec. EnaBond light-curing EnaHeat Pre-heated (55 °C) photopolymerizing composite |
| Belli et al. (2016) [53] | Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations Journal of Dental Research |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (emax CAD)/Leucite-reinforced ceramic (Empres CAD) |
NR |
| Murgueitio et al. (2012) [49] | Three-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Posterior Teeth Restored with Leucite-Reinforced IPS Empress Onlays and Partial Veneer Crowns American College of Prosthodontists |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress) |
Restoration: HF 20 sec. 5% (Ivoclar Vivadent) Monobond S. Excite DSC. Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 37% 20 sec. (selective enamel etching) Excite DSC. Dual cure resin cement (Variolink II) |
| Chrepa et al. (2014) [52] | The survival of indirect composite resin onlays for the restoration of root filled teeth: a retrospective medium-term study International Endodontic Journal |
Composite (Gradia GC) |
Dual cure, self-etching resin cement TotalCem |
| Archibald et al. (2017) [55] | Retrospective clinical evaluation of ceramic onlays placed by dental students The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate IPS emax Press/IPS emax CAD |
Restoration: HF 20 sec. 10% (Prosthetic Etchant Gel) Monobond S. Multilink Primer or Excite DSC/or Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 35% 30 sec. Multilink Primer or Excite DSC/or Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Dual polymerizing cement (Variolink II or RelyX Ultimate) |
| Fennis et al. (2014) [67] | Randomized Control Trial of Composite Cuspal Restorations: Five-year Results Journal of Dental Research |
Composite (Essentia, Kuraray) |
Restoration: Blasting 15 sec. with aluminum oxide 50 μm Orthophosphoric ac. 37% Clearfil SE Bond primer mixed with Clearfil bond Activator Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 37% 20 sec. in enamel ED primer (self-etching primer) applied to enamel and dentin 60 sec. Dual cure composite resin (Panavia F) |
| Schulte et al. (2005) [46] | Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin Journal of Dentistry |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress) |
Restoration: HF (Vita ceramics etch) Monobond S. Heliobond. Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 37% Syntac classic Heliobond Photopolymerizing composite resin (Tetric) |
| Spitznagel et al. (2018) [29] | Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years Clinical Oral Investigations |
Hybrid ceramic material (Vita Enamic CAD-CAM) |
Restoration: HF 4.9% (IPS ceramic gel) Monobond S. Optibond FL Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 37% enamel 40 sec./dentin 15 sec. Syntac Primer Sytac Adhesive Heliobond Dual cure resin cement (Variolink II) |
| Guess et al. (2013) [11] | Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study of Pressed and CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Partial-Coverage Restorations: 7-Year Results International Journal of Prosthodontics |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (IPS emax Press)/Leucite-reinforced ceramic (ProCAD) CAD-CAM |
Photopolymerizing hybrid resin cement (Tetric/Syntac Classic) |
| Roggendorf et al. (2012) [65] | Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth Clinical Oral Ivestigation |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic (VITABLOCS Mark II for CEREC)/Leucite-reinforced ceramic (ProCAD) |
Restoration: HF 4.9% (IPS ceramic gel) Monobond S. Optibond FL Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 35% Sytac Photopolymerizing hybrid resin cement (Tetric Ceram) dual cure (Variolink Ultra) |
| Stoll et al. (2007) [59] | Survival of Inlays and Partial Crowns Made of IPS Empress After a 10-year Observation Period and in Relation to Various Treatment Parameters Operative Dentistry |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress) |
Restoration: HF 4.9% (IPS ceramic gel) Monobond S. Optibond FL Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 35% Sytac Resin cement (Variolink cement or Variolink Ultra) |
| Beier et al. (2012) [48] | Clinical Performance of All-Ceramic Inlay and Onlay Restorations in Posterior Teeth The International Journal of Prosthodontics |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic, sintered | Optibond FL Syntac Classic Optec cement 3M Cement Dual Zement Variolink High Viscosity (Dual cure composite cements) |
| Signore et al. (2008) [47] | A 4- to 6-Year Retrospective Clinical Study of Cracked Teeth Restored with Bonded Indirect Resin Composite Onlays Int J Prosthodont |
Composite (Sculpture and Sculpture Plus) |
Restoration: Monobond S. Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 15 sec. Ecusit PrimerMono (dentin adhesive) Orthophosphoric ac. 37% (total etch) Ecusit PrimerMono Dual resin cement (Variolink cement) |
| Real Dias et al. (2016) [68] | Prognosis of Indirect Composite Resin Cuspal Coverage on Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: An In Vivo Prospective Study Journal of Prosthodontics |
Composite (Adoro System) |
Cement RelyX Unicem-Tr |
| Felden et al. (2000) [56] | Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig. |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (IPS Empress II) |
Composite cement (dual cure, photopolymerizing cure) |
| Van Dijken et al. (2010) [62] | A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater. |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic, pressed |
Restoration: HF 9.5% 2–3 sec. Orthophosphoric ac. 36% 20 sec. Monobond S Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 36% (enamel 10 sec., enamel and dentin 5 sec.) Composite cement (dual cure, photopolymerizing cure) |
| Barghi et al. (2002) [57] | Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain onlays: a 4-year report. Compend Contin Educ Dent. |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic, sintered | Dual cure composite cement |
| Smales et al. (2004) [58] | Survival of ceramic onlays placed with and without metal reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic, sintered (Mirage) | Dual cure composite cement (Mirage and Ultra-bond) |
| Kaytan et al. (2005) [45] | Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period. Gen Dent. |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic, pressed | Dual cure composite cement |
| Naeselius et al. (2008) [60] | Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study. Gen Dent. |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic, pressed | Dual cure and photopolymerizing cure composite cement |
| Barnes et al. (2010) [63] | Clinical evaluation of an all-ceramic restorative system: a 36-month clinical evaluation. Am J Dent. |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic, pressed (Finesse All-Ceramic) with an ultra-low fusing porcelain (Finesse) | Dual cure composite cements (Esthetic resin cements, Enforce & Calibra) |
| Atali et al. (2011) [64] | IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation. Int J Prosthodont |
Leucite-reinforced ceramic, pressed | Dual cure composite cements (Maxcem or Clearfil Esthetic Cement and DC Bond Kit luting systems) |
| Ozyoney et al. (2013) [66] | The efficacy of glass-ceramic onlays in the restoration of morphologically compromised and endodontically treated molars. Int J Prosthodont. |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (IPS Empress II) |
Restoration: HF 5% (IPS Empress ceramic etch) Tooth: Orthophosphoric ac. 35% Dentin bonding system: Solobond Plus Primer and Adhesive Dual cure high-viscosity composite cement (Bifix) |
| Baader et al. (2016) [54] | Self-adhesive Luting of Partial Ceramic Crowns: Selective Enamel Etching Leads to Higher Survival after 6.5 Years In Vivo. J Adhes. Dent. |
Conventional feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM (Vita Mark II) |
Restoration: HF 5% (HF Vita ceramics etch) Monobond S (silano) Tooth:Orthophosphoric ac. 37% Auto-cure composite cement and auto-cure cement with selective etching (RelyX Unicem) |
| Edelhoff et al. (2019) [7] | Clinical performance of occlusal onlays made of lithium disilicate ceramic in patients with severe tooth wear up to 11 years. Dental Materials. |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (IPS emax Press) |
Syntac Total etch & rinse technique, Variolink II Professional Set, low viscosity, light-curing |
| Coskun et al. (2020) [9] | Evaluation of two different CAD-CAM inlay-onlays in a split-mouth study: 2-year clinical follow-up J Esthet Restor Dent. |
Feldspathic ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate (IPS emax CAD)/Hybrid ceramic material (Cerasmart) |
Restoration (Cerasmart): Internal surface etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid (IPS Etching gel) 60 sec. Restoration (IPS emax CAD): Internal surface etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid (IPS Etching gel) 20 sec. Rinsed and silanized with Monobond Plus + Unfilled resin (Adhese Universal). Tooth: phosphoric acid gel 37% (Total Etch). Enamel 30 sec./dentin 15 sec. Adhese Universal 20 sec. Resin cement (Variolink Esthetic) |
| Fasbinder et al. (2020) [69] | Clinical evaluation of chairside Computer Assisted Design/Computer Assisted Machining nanoceramic restorations: Five-year status J Esthet Restor Dent. |
Leucite reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress CAD)/Hybrid resin nanoceramic material (Lava Ultimate) |
Restoration (IPS Empress CAD): 4.9% hydrofluoric acid gel 60 sec. Monobond Plus Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M) Restoration (Lava Ultimate): lightly air abraded with 30-μm silica (CoJet Sand; 3M) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M) Tooth (Variolink II cement): phosphoric acid 37% 20 sec. Excite (Ivoclar) dentin bonding agent Tooth (RelyX Ultimate cement): Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Cement Variolink II and RelyX Ultimate |
Author, year, title, journal, material and luting agent in cementation (distinguishing restoration and tooth preparation) were analyzed.