Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;15(19):1776–1782. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202000524

Table 1.

Summary of activity‐directed synthesis case studies.

Biological target (assay type)

Underpinning chemistry

Medicinal chemistry strategy

Number of rounds and reactions

Discoveries

1 (Figure 2, 9)

Androgen receptor (FRET)

Metal carbenoid

Scaffold discovery

3 rounds (36, 192 and 108 reactions)

Agonists and partial agonists with sub‐micromolar activity Scaffolds with no previously annotated AR activity

2 (Figure 3, 11)

Androgen receptor (FRET)

Metal carbenoid

Fragment growth

3 rounds (192, 86 and 48 reactions)

Four distinct chemotypes Elaborated fragments with low micromolar (or better) activity

3 (Figure 4, 12)

S. aureus (cell‐based bacterial)

Pd‐catalysed carbonylation

SAR expansion

1 round (220 reactions)

Expanded series of antibacterial quinazolinones

4 (Figure 5, 14)

p53/hDM2 PPI (fluorescence anisotropy)

Metal carbenoid

Scaffold hopping

2 rounds (154 and 192 reactions)

Experimental scaffold hopping to yield low micromolar PPI inhibitors Ligands for a binding site not evolved to bind small molecules