Red is pH 6.0, black is pH 7.4, squares are Na+ data and triangles are Cl− and all error bars represent standard deviations of the mean. One donor was omitted because a 11.43 mS cm−2 baseline conductance was identified as an outlier; Grubb's test α ≤ 0.01. A, representative dilution potential experiment not corrected for junction potentials. B, junction potential‐corrected dilution potential summary data for experiments containing identical solutions titrated to pH 7.4 or 6.0; n = 7 donors. The dashed lines represent theoretical dilution potentials calculated by substituting average relative permeability data from panel C into the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz equation. C, relative paracellular permeability, each circle represents a single human donor. P = 0.54; two‐tailed paired Student's t test; n = 7 donors. D, bilateral 150 mm NaCl paracellular conductance. Each circle represents a single human donor. P = 0.63; paired Student's t test; n = 7 donors. E, relative paracellular permeability vs. paracellular conductance, each circle represents a single human donor. We cannot reject the null hypothesis that the slopes were zero; pH 7.4 P = 0.15, pH 6.0 P = 0.25; F test; n = 7 donors each. F, paracellular ion permeability vs. paracellular conductance. Data were fit with linear regressions, r
2 > 0.98. We cannot reject the null hypothesis that the slopes were equal; P = 0.12; F test; n = 7 donors each ion and pH value.