Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7640. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207640

Table 2.

Lipid and glucose profiles in mice with HFD and UTS-001 treatment.

Parameters Chow-PBS Chow-UTS-001 (0.6 mg) Chow-UTS-001 (6 mg) HFD-PBS HFD-UTS-001 (0.6 mg) HFD-UTS-001 (6 mg)
Serum TG (mg/mL) 0.94 ± 0.032 1.15 ± 0.05 1.06 ± 0.047 1.12 ± 0.047* 1.21 ± 0.062 ** 1.19 ± 0.062 ***
Serum FFA (nM) 4.82 ± 0.21 4.74 ± 0.27 4.9 ± 0.25 5.49 ± 0.35 5.95 ± 0.48 4.8 ± 0.15
Liver Oil Red O staining (OD/mg of tissue) 0.0057 ± 0.00032 0.0066 ± 0.00059 0.00501 ± 0.00031 0.01898 ± 0.00321 *** 0.02489 ± 0.0016 **** 0.019 ± 0.00346 ****
Glucose (mM) 12.8 ± 1.2 12.9 ± 1.4 14.8 ± 0.3 17.5 ± 1.2 ** 19.15 ± 0.9 *** 18.1 ± 1.1 **
Serum insulin (ng/mL) 0.399 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.04 0.409 ± 0.04 0.412 ± 0.02 0.399 ± 0.03 0.415 ± 0.03
HOMA-IR 0.22 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.03 0.27 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.02 **** 0.34 ± 0.01 *** 0.32 ± 0.02 ***

Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and were analysed using two-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Fisher’s LSD tests. n = 7–12. * p < 0.05 vs. Chow-PBS; ** p < 0.01 vs. Chow-PBS; *** p < 0.001 vs. Chow-PBS; **** p < 0.0001 vs. Chow-PBS.