Table 2.
Lipid and glucose profiles in mice with HFD and UTS-001 treatment.
Parameters | Chow-PBS | Chow-UTS-001 (0.6 mg) | Chow-UTS-001 (6 mg) | HFD-PBS | HFD-UTS-001 (0.6 mg) | HFD-UTS-001 (6 mg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serum TG (mg/mL) | 0.94 ± 0.032 | 1.15 ± 0.05 | 1.06 ± 0.047 | 1.12 ± 0.047* | 1.21 ± 0.062 ** | 1.19 ± 0.062 *** |
Serum FFA (nM) | 4.82 ± 0.21 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 4.9 ± 0.25 | 5.49 ± 0.35 | 5.95 ± 0.48 | 4.8 ± 0.15 |
Liver Oil Red O staining (OD/mg of tissue) | 0.0057 ± 0.00032 | 0.0066 ± 0.00059 | 0.00501 ± 0.00031 | 0.01898 ± 0.00321 *** | 0.02489 ± 0.0016 **** | 0.019 ± 0.00346 **** |
Glucose (mM) | 12.8 ± 1.2 | 12.9 ± 1.4 | 14.8 ± 0.3 | 17.5 ± 1.2 ** | 19.15 ± 0.9 *** | 18.1 ± 1.1 ** |
Serum insulin (ng/mL) | 0.399 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.409 ± 0.04 | 0.412 ± 0.02 | 0.399 ± 0.03 | 0.415 ± 0.03 |
HOMA-IR | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 **** | 0.34 ± 0.01 *** | 0.32 ± 0.02 *** |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and were analysed using two-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Fisher’s LSD tests. n = 7–12. * p < 0.05 vs. Chow-PBS; ** p < 0.01 vs. Chow-PBS; *** p < 0.001 vs. Chow-PBS; **** p < 0.0001 vs. Chow-PBS.